3 sec in total
806 ms
1.9 sec
287 ms
Click here to check amazing Epicimaging content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epicimaging.com
Search your city and state or zip code to find the RAYUS Radiology, Insight Imaging or affiliated center nearest you.
Visit epicimaging.comWe analyzed Epicimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 806 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
epicimaging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value11.3 s
5/100
10%
Value1,410 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.584
11/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
806 ms
71 ms
28 ms
41 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Epicimaging.com, 16% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 15% (13 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (806 ms) belongs to the original domain Epicimaging.com.
Page size can be reduced by 910.1 kB (42%)
2.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Epicimaging.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epicimaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 752.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 752.4 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 108.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epicimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (58%)
71
30
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epicimaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epicimaging.com
806 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
71 ms
css
28 ms
css
41 ms
css
48 ms
style.css
192 ms
shortcodes.css
132 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
137 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
136 ms
page_templates.css
137 ms
jquery.js
262 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
198 ms
custom.js
255 ms
superfish.js
253 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
254 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
308 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
307 ms
wp-embed.min.js
329 ms
jquery-ui.js
7 ms
ga.js
33 ms
embed
227 ms
epic_4c-tag-150x150.png
103 ms
shutterstock_45612637.jpg
559 ms
shutterstock_181046504.jpg
622 ms
shutterstock_69804523.jpg
623 ms
screening-saves-lives-nobutton.jpg
220 ms
piggy-web.jpg
224 ms
footer_widget_bullet.png
221 ms
facebook.png
253 ms
app.js
44 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
21 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
22 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
25 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
39 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
25 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrsuoFAk0leveMLeqYtnfAY.woff
25 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxoUt79146ZFaIJxILcpzmhI.woff
38 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxqQf9gnzM91ovO3JZgha9gY.woff
24 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
collect
63 ms
embed-358efa9aad705488eb17c576d327af62.css
4 ms
sidebar-bullet.png
113 ms
js
80 ms
init_embed.js
74 ms
chat-up-f86f7d8e36129d549e2084e021169425.png
51 ms
data.json
57 ms
online.json
72 ms
chat-down-474bd2b1dc97c4163349e69e9cfa6616.png
52 ms
chat-secure-001c4b0d662f885c798ad7930cf43cc6.png
68 ms
chat-outreach-close-fb1825fca8a5a3fac2221328c6bbf2e4.png
67 ms
common.js
62 ms
map.js
62 ms
google4.png
127 ms
overlay.js
14 ms
util.js
10 ms
onion.js
12 ms
search_impl.js
10 ms
StaticMapService.GetMapImage
116 ms
stats.js
76 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
31 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
90 ms
controls.js
20 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
77 ms
kh
163 ms
kh
154 ms
transparent.png
68 ms
css
158 ms
entity11.png
83 ms
sliderback.png
117 ms
left-arrow.png
113 ms
right-arrow.png
112 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
66 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
66 ms
mapcnt6.png
101 ms
tmapctrl.png
70 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
54 ms
vt
123 ms
vt
116 ms
vt
99 ms
vt
148 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
112 ms
vt
146 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
46 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
45 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
45 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
45 ms
epicimaging.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
epicimaging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
epicimaging.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epicimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epicimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epicimaging.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Epicimaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: