11.8 sec in total
1.7 sec
9.7 sec
469 ms
Visit epidigm.com now to see the best up-to-date Epi Digm content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about epidigm.com
We can help you plan for retirement, saving for college, and more. Not only that, but we can also offer quality insurance at a fantastic rate. Contact us today!
Visit epidigm.comWe analyzed Epidigm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 10.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
epidigm.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.5 s
0/100
10%
Value12.3 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value2,850 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.358
30/100
15%
Value13.5 s
11/100
10%
1673 ms
88 ms
492 ms
514 ms
65 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Epidigm.com, 18% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Epidigm.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (78%)
2.0 MB
444.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Epidigm.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 37.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Epi Digm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 559.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 559.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 938.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epidigm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 938.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (82%)
62
11
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epi Digm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.epidigm.com
1673 ms
css
88 ms
styles.css
492 ms
settings.css
514 ms
css
65 ms
css
78 ms
css
102 ms
woo-projects.css
515 ms
woo-projects-handheld.css
527 ms
settings.css
542 ms
style.css
581 ms
css
100 ms
framework.css
735 ms
components.css
766 ms
responsive.css
768 ms
layers-icons.css
789 ms
style.css
809 ms
default.min.css
846 ms
js_composer.min.css
3447 ms
custom.css
1019 ms
Defaults.css
1015 ms
jquery.js
1564 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1063 ms
lightbox.js
1095 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1770 ms
jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js
1529 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1335 ms
plugins.js
1363 ms
css
77 ms
prettyPhoto.css
1615 ms
owl.carousel.css
1632 ms
owl.theme.default.css
1783 ms
animate.min.css
1840 ms
inline.css
1892 ms
custom.css
1884 ms
jquery.form.min.js
2003 ms
scripts.js
2019 ms
layers.framework.js
2082 ms
js_composer_front.js
2139 ms
waypoints.min.js
2149 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
2258 ms
jquery.twbsPagination.min.js
2273 ms
owl.carousel.js
2345 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1972 ms
underscore.min.js
1953 ms
vc_grid_style_all.js
2051 ms
vc_grid_style_load_more.js
2057 ms
vc_grid_style_lazy.js
2118 ms
vc_grid_style_pagination.js
2151 ms
vc_grid.js
1996 ms
skrollr.min.js
2053 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
2080 ms
analytics.js
14 ms
epidigmmasterlogo-hq-300x66.png
360 ms
epidigm-header-tender.jpg
1350 ms
sdk.js
30 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
171 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
169 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
170 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
169 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
169 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
170 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
173 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
171 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
171 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
171 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
172 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
171 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
172 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
172 ms
layers-icons.woff
272 ms
www.epidigm.com
871 ms
ajax-loader.gif
268 ms
diamond-pattern.png
615 ms
collect
35 ms
223 ms
xd_arbiter.php
24 ms
xd_arbiter.php
38 ms
epidigm.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
epidigm.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
epidigm.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epidigm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epidigm.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epidigm.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Epi Digm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: