2.1 sec in total
281 ms
1.6 sec
144 ms
Click here to check amazing Epotting content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epotting.com
Buy a domain and see how a premium domain can be the best investment. Your business starts here. Buy a domain today.
Visit epotting.comWe analyzed Epotting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
epotting.com performance score
281 ms
219 ms
60 ms
29 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Epotting.com, 10% (12 requests) were made to D.adroll.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 745.0 kB (66%)
1.1 MB
378.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Epotting.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 893.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Epotting needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 581.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 581.2 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epotting.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 81 (76%)
107
26
The browser has sent 107 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Epotting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epotting.com
281 ms
monetate.js
219 ms
application.css
60 ms
ng-modal.css
29 ms
angular.min.js
64 ms
ng-modal.js
45 ms
google_analytics.js
45 ms
google_oauth.js
45 ms
bold_chat.js
47 ms
eloqua.js
56 ms
hotjar.js
48 ms
adroll.js
49 ms
impactRadius.js
55 ms
in.js
70 ms
api.js
74 ms
api:client.js
88 ms
app.js
54 ms
cookies.js
54 ms
socialMedia.js
58 ms
countryDropdown.js
57 ms
monetate.js
56 ms
index.js
58 ms
lander.js
58 ms
seoPages.js
61 ms
sitePages.js
61 ms
search.js
61 ms
modal.js
60 ms
forms.js
62 ms
tldSelector.js
61 ms
setFixedTop.js
64 ms
searchBar.js
65 ms
currency.js
65 ms
trust.js
64 ms
conversion.js
52 ms
tdfs-inner.css
64 ms
tdfs-temp.css
65 ms
thankyou.css
64 ms
entry.js
9 ms
custom.js
9 ms
css
25 ms
fontawesome.min.css
6 ms
bd-icons.min.css
7 ms
ga.js
91 ms
foundation-A136666-2811-40ba-bff2-3df3af8bc2ae1.min.js
90 ms
userspace
167 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
87 ms
recaptcha__en.js
194 ms
all.js
359 ms
224 ms
logo-header-2x.png
77 ms
581009019-0
182 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
120 ms
227 ms
hotjar-10205.js
114 ms
elqCfg.min.js
89 ms
bg-main-hilight-fade.jpg
78 ms
bg-select.png
79 ms
bg-target-bd-icon.png
79 ms
__utm.gif
75 ms
foundation-tags-SD780-3f5b-4f28-957f-6e6dc25a7fc41.min.js
64 ms
postmessageRelay
140 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
41 ms
framework
65 ms
svrGP
195 ms
iframe
90 ms
modules-043c1e6abe660c48857202e419ff9d8a.js
79 ms
collect
117 ms
581009019-1
55 ms
61 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
1233565733-idpiframe.js
43 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
29 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
36 ms
svrGP.aspx
42 ms
iframerpc
32 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
8 ms
svrGP.aspx
46 ms
180 ms
xd_arbiter.php
210 ms
xd_arbiter.php
434 ms
vms.js
83 ms
fallback
23 ms
roundtrip.js
15 ms
fallback__ltr.css
3 ms
payload
20 ms
css
57 ms
542IK7HHBBFJJFENPFA7WX.js
87 ms
logo_48.png
15 ms
refresh.png
13 ms
audio.png
15 ms
bc.pv
154 ms
xd_arbiter.php
142 ms
fbevents.hashing.js
81 ms
out
15 ms
48 ms
6 ms
9 ms
out
6 ms
out
8 ms
out
9 ms
out
13 ms
out
12 ms
out
12 ms
out
12 ms
out
12 ms
38 ms
u.php
112 ms
adsct
120 ms
pixel
83 ms
47 ms
bounce
42 ms
u.php
107 ms
u.php
146 ms
u.php
151 ms
377928.gif
20 ms
u.php
148 ms
u.php
146 ms
70 ms
Pug
24 ms
tap.php
19 ms
sd
37 ms
in
5 ms
epotting.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epotting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Epotting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epotting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Epotting. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: