2.7 sec in total
752 ms
1.6 sec
327 ms
Click here to check amazing EProcessingNetwork content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eprocessingnetwork.com
Visit eprocessingnetwork.comWe analyzed Eprocessingnetwork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 752 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
eprocessingnetwork.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
66/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value6.0 s
46/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
92/100
10%
752 ms
82 ms
173 ms
131 ms
313 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Eprocessingnetwork.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Sealserver.trustwave.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Seal-houston.bbb.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (752 ms) belongs to the original domain Eprocessingnetwork.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (49%)
2.5 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Eprocessingnetwork.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.7 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EProcessingNetwork images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 704.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 704.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 465.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eprocessingnetwork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 465.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)
57
27
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EProcessingNetwork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eprocessingnetwork.com
752 ms
webfont-opensans.css
82 ms
bootstrap.min.css
173 ms
font-awesome.css
131 ms
sky-forms.css
313 ms
weather-icons.min.css
89 ms
line-icons.css
127 ms
owl.pack.css
123 ms
magnific-popup.css
130 ms
animate.css
166 ms
flexslider.css
186 ms
revolution-slider.css
216 ms
layerslider.css
189 ms
essentials.css
277 ms
layout.css
219 ms
header-4.css
235 ms
footer-default.css
228 ms
darkblue.css
262 ms
epn.css
257 ms
modernizr.min.js
270 ms
jquery.min.js
322 ms
jquery.isotope.js
298 ms
masonry.js
313 ms
bootstrap.min.js
337 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
320 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
341 ms
jquery.knob.js
344 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
355 ms
epn.js
407 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
414 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
408 ms
revolution_slider.js
426 ms
scripts.js
426 ms
seal_image.php
163 ms
blue-seal-96-50-eprocessing-network-llc-13006263.png
422 ms
ePNlogo.png
156 ms
ePNlogoSM.png
153 ms
1x1.png
153 ms
ePNEverywhere.png
157 ms
solutions.png
158 ms
desktop_certs.png
184 ms
FDLogo.jpg
156 ms
glo_log_pay_small.gif
154 ms
TSYS_VAR_Platinum_2014.png
156 ms
global.png
157 ms
ElavonLogo.gif
159 ms
JetPayLogo.gif
179 ms
heartland_pos.png
186 ms
sage-logo.jpg
189 ms
title_ncnlogo32_small.gif
192 ms
CrossCheck.jpg
193 ms
opticard_logo.png
218 ms
PaylianceLogo.png
227 ms
EZCheck.gif
230 ms
sps.png
236 ms
opensans.woff
188 ms
opensans-light.woff
226 ms
opensans-bold.woff
227 ms
opensans-extrabold.woff
227 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
228 ms
loader.gif
131 ms
bullet.png
153 ms
sexymobile.png
386 ms
revicons.woff
152 ms
eprocessingnetwork.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eprocessingnetwork.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eprocessingnetwork.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eprocessingnetwork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eprocessingnetwork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eprocessingnetwork.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EProcessingNetwork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: