Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

ergogeek.com

MAX Keyboards Custom Mechanical Keyboards and Cherry MX Keycaps

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

126 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

311 ms

ergogeek.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ergogeek content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ergogeek.com

MAX Keyboards offers custom mechanical keyboards, custom Cherry MX backlit keycaps, and other mechanical keyboard accessories.

Visit ergogeek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ergogeek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 126 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ergogeek.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value910 ms

31/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ergogeek.com

126 ms

www.maxkeyboard.com

579 ms

standalone.8608550c585d838989b258246e2b547d1706290491.css

40 ms

font-awesome.min.css

256 ms

max-webfont.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ergogeek.com, 38% (30 requests) were made to Maxkeyboard.com and 38% (30 requests) were made to D2fu7qgd3tdbcc.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Maxkeyboard.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Ergogeek.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 105.0 kB

  • Original 118.2 kB
  • After minification 92.7 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 85.0 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ergogeek images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 119.2 kB

  • Original 350.4 kB
  • After minification 349.9 kB
  • After compression 231.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 119.2 kB or 34% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 81.7 kB
  • After minification 81.7 kB
  • After compression 76.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ergogeek.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (47%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

35

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ergogeek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ergogeek.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ergogeek.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ergogeek.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ergogeek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ergogeek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ergogeek. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: