Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

esaila.com

Contemporary minimalist designs - ESAILA

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

270 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

esaila.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to esaila.com homepage info - get ready to check ESAILA best content right away, or after learning these important things about esaila.com

Esaila, we are a Taiwan based design house collaboration with passionate designers. We believe that a good design is a synthesis of commitment and determination in the pursuit of technical and aesthet...

Visit esaila.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Esaila.com page load time and found that the first response time was 270 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

esaila.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.174

69/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.0 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

esaila.com

270 ms

tJCyycs5Y9qaVReCMlQFjP6WSzBQxv83HRsmuQqBLtvfeG6IfFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9DZcIoZ2ZKZQsKw2IawRbU5Qbh5AZqwUnvMKG0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCHKoyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8if37OcBDOcu8OfG0ZWFy-AUyOAUTdA8XZAb0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOfG0SaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUyjamTiY8Djhy8ZYmC-Ao1Oco8ifUySkolZPU8ShBTdeIlde8l-Ws8ZfoDSWmyScmDSeBRZPoRdhXCZWFy-AUyOcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSaBujW48SagyjhmDjhy8ZYmC-Ao1OcFzdPUaiaS0jAFu-WsoShFGZAsude80ZkoRdhXCiaiaOcBRiA8XpWFR-emqiAUTdcS0dcmXOYiaikoySkolZPUaiaS0ZWFy-AUyOAUTdA8XZAb0SaBujW48Sagyjh90jhNlOYiaiko8ShBTdeI0jhNlOYiaikoDSWmyScmDSeBRZWFR-emqiAUTdcS0jhNlJ6U3ScNt-AuyOAozicI7fbKzMsMMeMb6MKGHfO2IMsMMeM96MKG4fHXgIMMjgKMfH6qJK3IbMg6YJMJ7fbK3MsMMeMt6MKGHfOYIMsMMeMv6MKG4fJ3gIMMjIPMfqMe20tWhgb.js

169 ms

css

116 ms

common-vendors-c563fb79948999a89a36d-min.en-US.js

186 ms

common-96f024e5ffdd31a2223e6-min.en-US.js

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Esaila.com, 20% (13 requests) were made to Images.squarespace-cdn.com and 17% (11 requests) were made to Static1.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Images.squarespace-cdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 110.8 kB (4%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Esaila.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 97.8 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 112.6 kB
  • After compression 24.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 97.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESAILA images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.2 kB

  • Original 129.7 kB
  • After minification 129.7 kB
  • After compression 127.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 15.0 kB
  • After minification 14.2 kB
  • After compression 5.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esaila.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (49%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESAILA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

esaila.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

esaila.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

esaila.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esaila.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esaila.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ESAILA. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: