Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

escalatorcleaning.us

Log into Facebook

Page Load Speed

5.3 sec in total

First Response

451 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

escalatorcleaning.us screenshot

About Website

Visit escalatorcleaning.us now to see the best up-to-date Escalatorcleaning content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about escalatorcleaning.us

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit escalatorcleaning.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Escalatorcleaning.us page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

escalatorcleaning.us performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

escalatorcleaning.us

451 ms

escalatorcleaning

2016 ms

kZ6kF1TjgK4.css

31 ms

CsWNZDQah6k.css

27 ms

sdnyqe74lDC.css

55 ms

Our browser made a total of 145 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Escalatorcleaning.us, 54% (79 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 37% (53 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 495.2 kB (33%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Escalatorcleaning.us main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 920.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 489.6 kB

  • Original 576.9 kB
  • After minification 575.6 kB
  • After compression 87.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 489.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

  • Original 920.7 kB
  • After minification 915.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Escalatorcleaning images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (48%)

Requests Now

143

After Optimization

74

The browser has sent 143 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Escalatorcleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

escalatorcleaning.us accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

escalatorcleaning.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

escalatorcleaning.us SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Escalatorcleaning.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Escalatorcleaning.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Escalatorcleaning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: