Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 92% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

eshark.co.uk

Agile London-based software development company – eShark LTD

Page Load Speed

7.4 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

5.9 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

eshark.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EShark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eshark.co.uk

Visit eshark.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Eshark.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eshark.co.uk performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.3 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.8 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.eshark.co.uk

1429 ms

dcrBDYAgDEDRhUBgE1dAUmJjoYQ2ErY3Ua5e__vBJeYLwVIcFmtml0RcIrSik8CEX9d4EIjx7hv9C5mr2jhAuMBWsK7cOqjO_WTlVTpI4yp4wwM.css

219 ms

bY5rEoMgDIQvJFLHi_QKiEFj5VEIdbi9WpgqM538yX67S-j58o7gU9OXhWmcvCBoNZqm49LaFwJbxcbQKMuXUHJtdv5HMjrICZrHraXtgCtoMLHC5bGeRzzKPl__qg3HCejSQh7-iNZciMQQLgVKgcyF-wXhHAjPuvacnxmiA68wzFXWeSBKz9lS_XlCF1JFFNIHx7AD.js

2401 ms

M9DPKtbPKixNLarUS8tJrSjOyUxJLdLNzcwDAA.js

2714 ms

M9DPKtYvKc8sKUkt0jEAcbIKS1OLKvWSS4tL8nN1TPTLC3RTc5NSU_RyM_MA.js

1150 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Eshark.co.uk, 21% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Eshark.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.7 kB (66%)

Content Size

13.1 kB

After Optimization

4.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Eshark.co.uk main page is 13.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 13.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 8.7 kB

  • Original 13.1 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (30%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EShark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

eshark.co.uk accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

eshark.co.uk best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

eshark.co.uk SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eshark.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eshark.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EShark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: