4.5 sec in total
149 ms
4.1 sec
331 ms
Click here to check amazing Eshark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eshark.in
The most unique and powerfull advertising technology company in india, We have Gobo lights, 3d hologram fan, 3d bill boards, intractive wall, Emmersive experience room, Projection mapping and more
Visit eshark.inWe analyzed Eshark.in page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
eshark.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value13.9 s
0/100
25%
Value9.2 s
13/100
10%
Value1,320 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
149 ms
2060 ms
214 ms
31 ms
217 ms
Our browser made a total of 130 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (90 requests) were addressed to the original Eshark.in, 16% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Eshark.in.
Page size can be reduced by 645.4 kB (49%)
1.3 MB
681.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Eshark.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 687.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 217.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 217.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 755 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eshark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 427.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 427.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (89%)
106
12
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eshark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 71 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eshark.in
149 ms
eshark.in
2060 ms
style.min.css
214 ms
css
31 ms
main.css
217 ms
styles.css
227 ms
contact-form-7-main.min.css
222 ms
woocommerce-layout.min.css
223 ms
woocommerce.min.css
297 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
275 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
347 ms
swiper.min.css
301 ms
post-2972.css
300 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
301 ms
uael-frontend.min.css
486 ms
global.css
376 ms
post-3639.css
380 ms
frontend.css
382 ms
post-3403.css
380 ms
frontend.css
416 ms
astra-addon-65b1f3a13cd912-69488074.css
451 ms
post-835.css
407 ms
css
33 ms
jquery.min.js
533 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
393 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
462 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
464 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
604 ms
hooks.min.js
477 ms
w.js
46 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
498 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
496 ms
js.cookie.min.js
547 ms
woocommerce.min.js
548 ms
js
106 ms
js
161 ms
adsbygoogle.js
149 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
570 ms
wc-blocks.css
506 ms
animations.min.css
539 ms
style.min.js
708 ms
main.js
709 ms
index.js
777 ms
index.js
707 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
698 ms
order-attribution.min.js
697 ms
react.min.js
689 ms
deprecated.min.js
688 ms
dom.min.js
686 ms
react-dom.min.js
762 ms
escape-html.min.js
735 ms
element.min.js
731 ms
is-shallow-equal.min.js
728 ms
i18n.min.js
730 ms
keycodes.min.js
678 ms
priority-queue.min.js
654 ms
compose.min.js
751 ms
private-apis.min.js
649 ms
redux-routine.min.js
651 ms
data.min.js
620 ms
lodash.min.js
712 ms
wc-blocks-registry.js
674 ms
url.min.js
667 ms
api-fetch.min.js
656 ms
wc-settings.js
655 ms
data-controls.min.js
640 ms
html-entities.min.js
639 ms
notices.min.js
737 ms
wc-blocks-middleware.js
736 ms
wc-blocks-data.js
872 ms
dom-ready.min.js
686 ms
a11y.min.js
683 ms
primitives.min.js
662 ms
warning.min.js
847 ms
g.gif
224 ms
fbevents.js
343 ms
gtm.js
217 ms
blocks-components.js
776 ms
show_ads_impl.js
469 ms
blocks-checkout.js
652 ms
order-attribution-blocks.min.js
643 ms
frontend.js
646 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
587 ms
astra-addon-65b1f3a13d4c54-30222520.js
582 ms
single-product-ajax-cart.min.js
585 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
586 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
610 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
615 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
613 ms
252 ms
243 ms
frontend.min.js
497 ms
waypoints.min.js
495 ms
core.min.js
492 ms
frontend.min.js
554 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
564 ms
cropped-Eshark-1-white-1-133x27.png
560 ms
5.png
840 ms
6.png
699 ms
1-1.png
830 ms
js
142 ms
analytics.js
115 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
204 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
205 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
298 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
298 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
303 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
302 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
303 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
302 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
302 ms
1cXxaUPXBpj2rGoU7C9WiHGD.woff
301 ms
LYjGdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEoodNw.woff
305 ms
LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyELbV8_YeJc.woff
418 ms
LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEL3UM_YeJc.woff
494 ms
LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKTUc_YeJc.woff
413 ms
LYjbdGHgj0k1DIQRyUEyyEKPUs_YeJc.woff
419 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7j.woff
303 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ik4zwlxdo.woff
412 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i94_wlxdo.woff
412 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdo.woff
416 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdo.woff
417 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3iu4nwlxdo.woff
415 ms
2.png
794 ms
collect
99 ms
206 ms
198 ms
ads
87 ms
30 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.min.css
75 ms
eshark.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eshark.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eshark.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eshark.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eshark.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eshark.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eshark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: