6.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
5.4 sec
155 ms
Welcome to esocite2016.esocite.net homepage info - get ready to check ESOCITE 2016 best content right away, or after learning these important things about esocite2016.esocite.net
Visit esocite2016.esocite.netWe analyzed Esocite2016.esocite.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
esocite2016.esocite.net performance score
1093 ms
275 ms
277 ms
410 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Esocite2016.esocite.net, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Esocite2016.esocite.net.
Page size can be reduced by 298.3 kB (47%)
628.2 kB
329.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Esocite2016.esocite.net main page is 628.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 244.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ESOCITE 2016 images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 155.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 155.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 103.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esocite2016.esocite.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 103.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (53%)
51
24
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESOCITE 2016. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
1093 ms
dynamiccontent.css
275 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
277 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.css
410 ms
tabview.css
278 ms
extra.css
279 ms
page.css
545 ms
formularios.css
547 ms
capa.css
420 ms
common.css
420 ms
cfgstatus.css
427 ms
dype-grid-compiled-gridexterna-1444143015-core-1444143015.css
970 ms
php2go.js
827 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
688 ms
default.js
691 ms
jquery-1.8.2.min.js
1380 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
701 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js
1099 ms
dSlider.js
966 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.2.custom.min.js
1112 ms
utils.js
1338 ms
form.js
1475 ms
inputmask.js
1474 ms
validator.js
1510 ms
css
27 ms
structures.js
412 ms
dom.js
918 ms
compat.js
775 ms
locale.php
906 ms
background.jpg
943 ms
header-pt-br.png
416 ms
fundo-menu.gif
272 ms
bkg_form.gif
279 ms
newspaper.png
277 ms
pt-br.gif
283 ms
es.gif
547 ms
success.png
547 ms
calendar.png
552 ms
artigo.png
556 ms
map.png
692 ms
chronometer.png
823 ms
facebook.png
824 ms
twitter.png
826 ms
youtube.png
831 ms
banner_1443820249_5_4_esocite-al.jpg
969 ms
banner_1446643418_5_4_image_preview.jpg
1580 ms
banner_1443820249_5_4_UTFPR.jpg
1583 ms
banner_1446643471_5_4_4P-esocite.jpg
1580 ms
banner_1443820249_5_4_UFPR.jpg
1581 ms
banner_1443820222_5_4_esocite.jpg
1583 ms
ga.js
12 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
16 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
esocite2016.esocite.net SEO score
PT
PT
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Esocite2016.esocite.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Portuguese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Esocite2016.esocite.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
esocite2016.esocite.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ESOCITE 2016. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: