Tools & Wizards About Us
estheticon.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

estheticon.de

Die Community für ästhetisch-plastische Chirurgie und Kosmetik - Estheticon.de

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

236 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

511 ms

estheticon.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Estheticon content for Switzerland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estheticon.de

Das Portal über ästhetische Medizin und plastische Chirurgie, in der Sie die besten plastischen Chirurgen, Spezialisten für ästhetische Medizin und Dermatologie sowie die innovativsten Behandlungen fi...

Visit estheticon.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Estheticon.de page load time and found that the first response time was 236 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estheticon.de performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

estheticon.de

236 ms

www.estheticon.de

240 ms

front.css

51 ms

style.css

72 ms

homepage.css

153 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Estheticon.de, 38% (29 requests) were made to D32dq8khacxhzy.cloudfront.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (557 ms) belongs to the original domain Estheticon.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 649.9 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

462.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Estheticon.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 558.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 63.2 kB
  • After minification 62.9 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 211.4 kB
  • After minification 197.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estheticon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 352.9 kB

  • Original 558.2 kB
  • After minification 557.9 kB
  • After compression 205.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 352.9 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 234.1 kB

  • Original 279.8 kB
  • After minification 278.3 kB
  • After compression 45.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estheticon.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (41%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

40

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estheticon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

estheticon.de

estheticon.de

236 ms

www.estheticon.de

www.estheticon.de

240 ms

front.css

front.css

51 ms

style.css

style.css

72 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

153 ms

require.js

require.js

72 ms

jsapi

jsapi

71 ms

brand

brand

72 ms

foo.js

foo.js

93 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

15 ms

dc.js

dc.js

43 ms

j.php

j.php

39 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

39 ms

vdapc-anerkannt.gif

vdapc-anerkannt.gif

161 ms

151 ms

all.svg

all.svg

16 ms

bg.png

bg.png

16 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

20 ms

vertical-delimiter.png

vertical-delimiter.png

21 ms

post-count-arrow.png

post-count-arrow.png

55 ms

onepixel.gif

onepixel.gif

54 ms

777466.jpg

777466.jpg

18 ms

777467.jpg

777467.jpg

18 ms

775959.jpg

775959.jpg

20 ms

771916.jpg

771916.jpg

30 ms

771568.jpg

771568.jpg

32 ms

540079.jpg

540079.jpg

32 ms

772098.jpg

772098.jpg

31 ms

666496.jpg

666496.jpg

33 ms

DE.svg

DE.svg

34 ms

de.png

de.png

32 ms

footer-delimiter.png

footer-delimiter.png

33 ms

geoDoctorsHp.js

geoDoctorsHp.js

14 ms

v.gif

v.gif

12 ms

pubads_impl_81.js

pubads_impl_81.js

29 ms

inpage_linkid.js

inpage_linkid.js

25 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

97 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

96 ms

ads

ads

372 ms

container.html

container.html

259 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

249 ms

777465.jpg

777465.jpg

245 ms

default+en.css

default+en.css

116 ms

default+en.I.js

default+en.I.js

120 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

119 ms

foundation.min.js

foundation.min.js

152 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

136 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js

134 ms

geocoder

geocoder

259 ms

199 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

213 ms

462 ms

123 ms

sessionid.php

sessionid.php

328 ms

updatesitemap

updatesitemap

296 ms

64 ms

85 ms

7502104666366206863

7502104666366206863

62 ms

osd.js

osd.js

21 ms

62 ms

5

5

134 ms

53

53

557 ms

jquery.smartbanner.js

jquery.smartbanner.js

13 ms

657869.jpg

657869.jpg

89 ms

654854.jpg

654854.jpg

156 ms

653055.jpg

653055.jpg

176 ms

sessionid.php

sessionid.php

179 ms

202 ms

css

css

27 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

30 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

49 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

88 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

88 ms

687982.jpg

687982.jpg

92 ms

746894.jpg

746894.jpg

92 ms

684682.jpg

684682.jpg

110 ms

Accessibility Review

estheticon.de accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

estheticon.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

estheticon.de SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheticon.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estheticon.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

estheticon.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Estheticon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: