6.2 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.7 sec
315 ms
Visit etrack.com.au now to see the best up-to-date ETrack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about etrack.com.au
Visit etrack.com.auWe analyzed Etrack.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
etrack.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.015
100/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
1146 ms
533 ms
522 ms
528 ms
521 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Etrack.com.au, 13% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Etrack.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (55%)
2.1 MB
967.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Etrack.com.au main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 878.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ETrack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 333.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 775.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etrack.com.au needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 775.5 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ETrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
etrack.com.au
1146 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
533 ms
q-a-plus.css
522 ms
settings.css
528 ms
respvid.css
521 ms
css
25 ms
css
37 ms
royalslider.css
532 ms
rs-universal.css
673 ms
rs-gallery-with-text-thumbs.css
785 ms
motioncss.css
791 ms
motioncss-responsive.css
794 ms
font-awesome.css
786 ms
magnific-popup.css
785 ms
fotorama.css
903 ms
style.css
1488 ms
responsive.css
1033 ms
style.css
1034 ms
us_impreza_custom_styles.css
1032 ms
ultimate.min.css
1500 ms
Defaults.css
1137 ms
jquery.js
1718 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1260 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
1261 ms
headings.min.js
1370 ms
jquery.highlight-5.closure.js
1542 ms
froog.js
1542 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2078 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2005 ms
q-a-plus.js
1824 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1823 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
1824 ms
jquery.simpleplaceholder.js
1944 ms
waypoints.min.js
2038 ms
imagesloaded.js
2040 ms
plugins.js
2039 ms
us.widgets.js
2171 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2233 ms
jquery.royalslider.min.js
2303 ms
etrackimac_schedule.png
1310 ms
etrackipad_modern_home.png
1066 ms
oilrig.jpg
1754 ms
bridge.jpg
1752 ms
office1.jpg
1996 ms
etrackimac_welcome.png
1296 ms
etrackipad_modern_utilise.png
1299 ms
etrack-logo-flat.jpg
525 ms
etrack-logo-flat1.jpg
921 ms
gaussian-blur2.jpg
1031 ms
gaussian_blur1.jpg
1385 ms
gaussian-blur2.jpg
1200 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
6 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
15 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
14 ms
LeFlHvsZjXu2c3ZRgBq9nKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
13 ms
PIbvSEyHEdL91QLOQRnZ14nF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
13 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
937 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
12 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
13 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
33 ms
etrack.com.au accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
etrack.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
etrack.com.au SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etrack.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Etrack.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
etrack.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ETrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: