Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

excid3.com

Chris Oliver

Page Load Speed

933 ms in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

634 ms

Page Rendered

194 ms

excid3.com screenshot

About Website

Visit excid3.com now to see the best up-to-date Excid 3 content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about excid3.com

Chris Oliver specializes in web development and user experience design with Ruby on Rails, Javascript, HTML5, and CSS3

Visit excid3.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Excid3.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 828 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

excid3.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

98/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

excid3.com

105 ms

ionicons.min.css

7 ms

main.css

18 ms

voa6eso.js

168 ms

widgets.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Excid3.com, 41% (7 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 29% (5 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (190 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 59.6 kB (81%)

Content Size

73.6 kB

After Optimization

14.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Excid3.com main page is 73.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 59.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

  • Original 14.4 kB
  • After minification 13.5 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 49.4 kB

  • Original 59.2 kB
  • After minification 56.8 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Excid3.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 49.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (30%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Excid 3. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

excid3.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

excid3.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

excid3.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Excid3.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Excid3.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Excid 3. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: