5.2 sec in total
1.4 sec
3.6 sec
299 ms
Visit ezeontech.com now to see the best up-to-date EZEON Tech content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ezeontech.com
Visit ezeontech.comWe analyzed Ezeontech.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ezeontech.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.5 s
0/100
10%
Value17.3 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value13.0 s
13/100
10%
1376 ms
281 ms
440 ms
110 ms
273 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Ezeontech.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezeontech.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (62%)
2.0 MB
749.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezeontech.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 891.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 128.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EZEON Tech images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 624.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 624.5 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 451.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezeontech.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 451.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
63
28
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EZEON Tech. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ezeontech.com
1376 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
281 ms
style.css
440 ms
styles.css
110 ms
settings.css
273 ms
responsive.css
130 ms
icomoon.css
410 ms
wpp.css
190 ms
js_composer.css
448 ms
jquery.js
313 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
331 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
533 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
550 ms
css
23 ms
css
35 ms
css
13 ms
analytics.js
4 ms
collect
12 ms
jquery.form.min.js
141 ms
scripts.js
214 ms
scripts.js
348 ms
nicescroll.min.js
227 ms
jsapi
25 ms
map.js
254 ms
mediaelement.js
427 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
306 ms
jquery.validate.js
425 ms
jquery.countdown.js
341 ms
jquery.easychart.js
301 ms
responsivecarousel.min.js
301 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
383 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
384 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
384 ms
jquery.ui.menu.min.js
402 ms
jquery.ui.autocomplete.min.js
420 ms
jquery.scrollTo.js
420 ms
jquery.pace.js
655 ms
jquery.custom.js
420 ms
js_composer_front.js
741 ms
preloader.gif
363 ms
logo1.png
389 ms
logo_retina1.png
602 ms
digital_trands_slider.jpg
355 ms
software_development_slider.jpg
436 ms
technology_innovation_slider.jpg
464 ms
eis_digital2-300x168.jpg
465 ms
ezedr1-300x168.jpg
468 ms
mwo-300x168.jpg
601 ms
asi-300x168.jpg
602 ms
logo_footer.png
601 ms
isca.min_-250x250.jpg
609 ms
dr-rai.min_-250x250.jpg
609 ms
hk.min_-250x250.jpg
602 ms
musuem.min_-250x250.jpg
603 ms
mg.min_-250x250.jpg
603 ms
freedom.min_-250x250.jpg
630 ms
scrum-250x250.jpg
615 ms
eis_digital2-250x250.jpg
616 ms
ezedr1-250x250.jpg
662 ms
tile-texture.jpg
783 ms
slidebg1.jpg
783 ms
map.png
781 ms
sourcesanspro-regular-webfont.woff
776 ms
Icomoon.svg
1070 ms
1TiHc9yag0wq3lDO9cw0vj8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
77 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
77 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
77 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
868 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
698 ms
sourcesanspro-bold-webfont.woff
697 ms
Museo500-Regular-webfont.woff
727 ms
ezeontech.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ezeontech.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ezeontech.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezeontech.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezeontech.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezeontech.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EZEON Tech. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: