3.1 sec in total
199 ms
2.5 sec
385 ms
Click here to check amazing Research Eeye content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about research.eeye.com
Get secure remote desktop control of every computer in your organization – Enterprise Remote Support. Greater security over remote access software: PC, Mac, Linux, Enterprise and SMB support - B...
Visit research.eeye.comWe analyzed Research.eeye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
research.eeye.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
22/100
10%
Value10.5 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value1,480 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.083
94/100
15%
Value19.1 s
3/100
10%
199 ms
316 ms
1118 ms
10 ms
13 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Research.eeye.com, 66% (23 requests) were made to Beyondtrust.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Beyondtrust.com.
Page size can be reduced by 564.2 kB (79%)
713.4 kB
149.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Research.eeye.com main page is 713.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 426.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 292.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 199.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Research.eeye.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 199.9 kB or 100% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (76%)
29
7
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Research Eeye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
research.eeye.com
199 ms
316 ms
www.beyondtrust.com
1118 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
10 ms
widget.css
13 ms
style.css
24 ms
app.min.css
24 ms
style.css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
gtm4wp-social-tracker.js
40 ms
gtm4wp-youtube.js
40 ms
froogaloop.js
40 ms
gtm4wp-vimeo.js
41 ms
analytics-talk-content-tracking.js
40 ms
modernizr.js
41 ms
searchwp-live-search.min.js
39 ms
app.min.js
40 ms
wp-embed.min.js
38 ms
iframe_api
542 ms
munchkin.js
530 ms
gtm.js
591 ms
logo-mark.svg
463 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
346 ms
widgets.js
139 ms
logo-word.svg
32 ms
2EE214_0_0.woff
78 ms
2EE214_1_0.woff
93 ms
beyond-trust-icons.woff
32 ms
_Incapsula_Resource
9 ms
www-widgetapi.js
86 ms
munchkin.js
210 ms
analytics.js
56 ms
linkid.js
10 ms
collect
12 ms
collect
55 ms
research.eeye.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
ARIA IDs are not unique
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
research.eeye.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
research.eeye.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Research.eeye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Research.eeye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
research.eeye.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Research Eeye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: