Tools & Wizards About Us
facebook.hr screenshot

Report Summary

  • 75

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

facebook.hr

Facebook - log in or sign up

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

166 ms

facebook.hr screenshot

About Website

Visit facebook.hr now to see the best up-to-date Facebook content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about facebook.hr

Log into Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family, and people you know.

Visit facebook.hr

Key Findings

We analyzed Facebook.hr page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

facebook.hr performance score

75

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

44/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.0 s

87/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.facebook.com

172 ms

RDCmA36AiNe.css

85 ms

I5kTXq1bSJZ.css

105 ms

V89xIM8XrVh.css

124 ms

cExaeQ07vMA.css

153 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Facebook.hr, 9% (3 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 6% (2 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (184 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 55.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

96.2 kB

After Optimization

40.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Facebook.hr main page is 96.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 75.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 75.0 kB
  • After minification 74.9 kB
  • After compression 21.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Facebook images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (72%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Facebook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.facebook.com

www.facebook.com

172 ms

RDCmA36AiNe.css

RDCmA36AiNe.css

85 ms

I5kTXq1bSJZ.css

I5kTXq1bSJZ.css

105 ms

V89xIM8XrVh.css

V89xIM8XrVh.css

124 ms

cExaeQ07vMA.css

cExaeQ07vMA.css

153 ms

mKIPuHvlbBA.css

mKIPuHvlbBA.css

139 ms

CkBJsJ-mGCK.css

CkBJsJ-mGCK.css

153 ms

3PXshBSsmpj.css

3PXshBSsmpj.css

159 ms

nh2wUMLNld2.js

nh2wUMLNld2.js

159 ms

851565_602269956474188_918638970_n.png

851565_602269956474188_918638970_n.png

184 ms

OO40hDeOZvT.js

OO40hDeOZvT.js

50 ms

lnwXDK64af8.js

lnwXDK64af8.js

75 ms

wRXOQ26LQ1k.js

wRXOQ26LQ1k.js

74 ms

x8BMxYCqTb9.js

x8BMxYCqTb9.js

49 ms

VAFHT3WOlau.js

VAFHT3WOlau.js

49 ms

bwNCMka7Wp5.js

bwNCMka7Wp5.js

47 ms

XhEAMpdbL1F.js

XhEAMpdbL1F.js

72 ms

LIHAaXrKkGk.js

LIHAaXrKkGk.js

75 ms

QilD8WGfZiV.js

QilD8WGfZiV.js

72 ms

5RMvRAKQim0.js

5RMvRAKQim0.js

71 ms

In8KOzYgNHs.js

In8KOzYgNHs.js

164 ms

851585_216271631855613_2121533625_n.png

851585_216271631855613_2121533625_n.png

158 ms

851558_160351450817973_1678868765_n.png

851558_160351450817973_1678868765_n.png

166 ms

ZVyMWStefv_.png

ZVyMWStefv_.png

157 ms

Fy3hs8lKW0M.png

Fy3hs8lKW0M.png

158 ms

GsNJNwuI-UM.gif

GsNJNwuI-UM.gif

156 ms

7A==

7A==

18 ms

8AIaACgBqQAkAhYALQHJAEYCwQBaAAAAAAIbACU=

8AIaACgBqQAkAhYALQHJAEYCwQBaAAAAAAIbACU=

17 ms

8v2_hdH4Nfm.js

8v2_hdH4Nfm.js

20 ms

TcfjiotWh8T.js

TcfjiotWh8T.js

71 ms

OJIhOkl_3ZX.js

OJIhOkl_3ZX.js

20 ms

VXcANLwwL5J.js

VXcANLwwL5J.js

23 ms

50Trs1RKgUY.js

50Trs1RKgUY.js

22 ms

px2fTQMFbxi.js

px2fTQMFbxi.js

19 ms

-PAXP-deijE.gif

-PAXP-deijE.gif

21 ms

Accessibility Review

facebook.hr accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

facebook.hr best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

facebook.hr SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Facebook.hr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Facebook.hr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

facebook.hr

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Facebook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: