3.9 sec in total
276 ms
3.5 sec
99 ms
Click here to check amazing Facelink content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about facelink.ru
Visit facelink.ruWe analyzed Facelink.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 276 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
facelink.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.5 s
95/100
10%
Value1.5 s
100/100
25%
Value4.9 s
65/100
10%
Value1,960 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.066
97/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
276 ms
321 ms
1159 ms
707 ms
408 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Facelink.ru, 84% (42 requests) were made to Cdneu.wambacdn.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Top-fwz1.mail.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Cdneu.wambacdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.4 MB (66%)
3.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Facelink.ru main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 81.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Facelink needs image optimization as it can save up to 81.3 kB or 35% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 913.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 913.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Facelink.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (90%)
49
5
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Facelink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
276 ms
Stats.min.js
321 ms
base.css
1159 ms
style.css
707 ms
layers.css
408 ms
ui-userbar.css
421 ms
style.css
336 ms
style482393.css
492 ms
lib_versions.js
600 ms
routes.js
490 ms
polyfill.js
509 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
742 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
574 ms
lodash.4.2.1.compat.min.js
686 ms
knockout-3.2.0.js
817 ms
rx.all.compat.js
864 ms
bowser.js
774 ms
require.js
789 ms
code.js
908 ms
config.js
862 ms
components.js
1554 ms
web.full.css
898 ms
icons.css
1309 ms
icons.css
1420 ms
stickers.css
980 ms
en.js
992 ms
core.js
1391 ms
moment.js
1075 ms
angular.min.js
1271 ms
angular-resource.min.js
1270 ms
Modal.js
1322 ms
mamba-app.js
1328 ms
paymentMethods.js
1393 ms
advert.js
1405 ms
vipModule.js
1412 ms
photolineModule.js
1476 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1494 ms
maketopModule.js
1177 ms
applicationChargeModule.js
1169 ms
giftModule.js
1107 ms
leaderModule.js
1320 ms
browser.png
131 ms
init.js
154 ms
code.js
319 ms
AuthStatusMonitor.js
95 ms
init.js
203 ms
Mambarber.js
255 ms
SynchroMambaTab.js
154 ms
counter
163 ms
tracker
161 ms
facelink.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
facelink.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
facelink.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Facelink.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Facelink.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
facelink.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Facelink. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: