Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

familyroute.com

Contact Support

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

906 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

218 ms

familyroute.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to familyroute.com homepage info - get ready to check Familyroute best content right away, or after learning these important things about familyroute.com

Visit familyroute.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Familyroute.com page load time and found that the first response time was 906 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

familyroute.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

81/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value430 ms

64/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

familyroute.com

906 ms

jquery.js

191 ms

DD_roundies.js

141 ms

jquery.cross-slide.js

150 ms

wpsf-js.php

563 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Familyroute.com, 14% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 7% (1 request) were made to M.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (906 ms) belongs to the original domain Familyroute.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 456.3 kB (61%)

Content Size

746.2 kB

After Optimization

289.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Familyroute.com main page is 746.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 529.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 108.3 kB

  • Original 143.5 kB
  • After minification 142.3 kB
  • After compression 35.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 73.6 kB
  • After minification 70.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Familyroute images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 345.2 kB

  • Original 529.1 kB
  • After minification 518.0 kB
  • After compression 183.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 345.2 kB or 65% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (38%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Familyroute. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

familyroute.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

familyroute.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

familyroute.com SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Familyroute.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Familyroute.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Familyroute. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: