3 sec in total
505 ms
2.1 sec
356 ms
Click here to check amazing FAPACK content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fapack.de
Berlins ältester Hersteller von hochwertigen Kartonagen. Ihr Profi für Verpackungsmaterial heißt FAPACK.
Visit fapack.deWe analyzed Fapack.de page load time and found that the first response time was 505 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
fapack.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value5.9 s
65/100
10%
505 ms
123 ms
191 ms
33 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Fapack.de, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (827 ms) belongs to the original domain Fapack.de.
Page size can be reduced by 371.4 kB (25%)
1.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Fapack.de main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FAPACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 158.2 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 178.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 178.5 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fapack.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (39%)
49
30
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FAPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fapack.de
505 ms
style.css
123 ms
lightbox.css
191 ms
css
33 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
192 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
467 ms
jquery.effects.core.min.js
205 ms
jquery.effects.slide.min.js
219 ms
jquery.effects.blind.min.js
220 ms
jquery.superbgimage.min.js
283 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
285 ms
lightbox-2.6.min.js
307 ms
bjqs-1.3.min.js
333 ms
custom-form-elements.js
333 ms
main.js
377 ms
plugins.js
381 ms
accounting.js
415 ms
configurator.js
430 ms
form.js
445 ms
normalize.min.css
357 ms
jquery.slider.css
360 ms
close.png
167 ms
loading.gif
165 ms
prev.png
161 ms
next.png
162 ms
handwriting_sprite.png
827 ms
text-white.png
161 ms
4b696-gbh_10795_c_a4_copyright.jpg
220 ms
49eee-_mg_8763.jpg
207 ms
d6505-_mg_8749.jpg
206 ms
81bfc-_mg_8760.jpg
207 ms
32e74-_mg_8752.jpg
226 ms
1bee3-_mg_8762.jpg
280 ms
ab28d-_mg_8756.jpg
280 ms
b404b-_mg_8504.jpg
279 ms
ec27b-oskarnominierung_2015.jpg
487 ms
1f5d6-buergerpreis-2014_560x325.jpg
323 ms
5fd25-marcia_behrens_ihk_kleine_aufloesung.jpg
374 ms
21ab8-uberuns.jpg
375 ms
5b7c5-bild2neu.jpg
374 ms
icon-mail.png
434 ms
icon-phone.png
469 ms
facebook.png
468 ms
airpop.jpg
470 ms
logo-footer-gkv-cert.png
547 ms
logo-footer-german-cert.png
563 ms
logo-footer-eu-cert.png
563 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
32 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
33 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
32 ms
collect
27 ms
collect
60 ms
background-green.jpg
304 ms
fapack.de accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
fapack.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fapack.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fapack.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fapack.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fapack.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FAPACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: