2.9 sec in total
94 ms
2.3 sec
455 ms
Visit farefetch.com now to see the best up-to-date Farefetch content for Ukraine and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about farefetch.com
SAP Concur simplifies travel, expense and invoice management for total visibility and greater control. Contact us today.
Visit farefetch.comWe analyzed Farefetch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 94 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
farefetch.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value45,540 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.117
85/100
15%
Value68.4 s
0/100
10%
94 ms
569 ms
84 ms
26 ms
61 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Farefetch.com, 86% (43 requests) were made to Concur.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Assets.concur.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (959 ms) relates to the external source Concur.com.
Page size can be reduced by 180.1 kB (41%)
439.7 kB
259.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Farefetch.com main page is 439.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 205.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Farefetch images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 40% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Farefetch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (36%)
39
25
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Farefetch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
farefetch.com
94 ms
www.concur.com
569 ms
highlight.js
84 ms
css_xE-rWrJf-fncB6ztZfd2huxqgxu4WO-qwma6Xer30m4.css
26 ms
css_I7kYLsT2tcrx-Sfs7r-6JYQ4MnOCyd5FZzunC08IaYM.css
61 ms
css_rA-kUTd_NJMjGq_IiindqQOLyz_gWrnbpTkDQrnNxsw.css
175 ms
css_dY8lzXxIud3FIHgiJVSKC826jQGX7yMQizew80YddgM.css
187 ms
css_RvakhNdSaXg4HOt20IfFkm8lp0Kce4ZJ44J3KSnuasE.css
107 ms
js_PFctIrDh0JUCLrw-Jja4Pt1KFj1RcU33H9fUY9PLxhc.js
379 ms
demandbase_loader.js
184 ms
js_9bYr_mVhG7TzGYY38srcxslYlCJV1jxP9pP2Sgy6FcQ.js
170 ms
js_VkXfTRoLRObD5AOkmkvCRLFNMdBT-M7upUdJRT8foJ4.js
786 ms
js_mKnRPfdtL-GNvwKInkEnQGzWx5bNN5iLai2krfrC-Ok.js
788 ms
js_0aHd1c7JfdU8ZppWVnnJ4Faq-Vpim_XrdaOcW_T2pHk.js
376 ms
homepage-2021.css
375 ms
homepage-2021.js
366 ms
js_HkXE8z_7DGceUzZLE1N69r05SdZXrCarZGSgmwYL1MM.js
959 ms
56VGK-KZ5VS-7BMLL-58DHU-CTJGD
372 ms
fa--arrow.svg
580 ms
sap-concur.svg
289 ms
sap-logo.png
286 ms
us.svg
288 ms
ico-search.png
285 ms
ico-arrow.png
290 ms
expense_pictogram_0.png
289 ms
invoice-pictogram.png
291 ms
travel-pictogram_0.png
290 ms
bridgestone.png
294 ms
adp_logo_0.png
292 ms
salesforce_logo.png
351 ms
elizabeth_logo.png
289 ms
twitter_logo.png
351 ms
unisys_logo_1.png
352 ms
ericsson_logo.png
350 ms
redcross_logo.png
352 ms
genmills_logo.png
352 ms
ibm_logo_1.png
348 ms
image--concur-expense-demo.jpg
671 ms
image--concur-invoice-demo.jpg
585 ms
benton-light.woff
118 ms
benton-reg.woff
119 ms
benton-medium.woff
117 ms
benton-bold.woff
118 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
118 ms
homepage-stairstep.png
85 ms
benton-bold-italic.woff
161 ms
benton-medium-italic.woff
160 ms
benton-reg-italic.woff
247 ms
benton-light-italic.woff
246 ms
config.json
115 ms
farefetch.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
farefetch.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
farefetch.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Farefetch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Farefetch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
farefetch.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Farefetch. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: