2.2 sec in total
125 ms
1.8 sec
214 ms
Welcome to fatfeet.com homepage info - get ready to check Fat Feet best content right away, or after learning these important things about fatfeet.com
Visit fatfeet.comWe analyzed Fatfeet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 125 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
fatfeet.com performance score
125 ms
627 ms
81 ms
740 ms
624 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fatfeet.com, 61% (27 requests) were made to Graphics.pop6.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Banners.adultfriendfinder.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) relates to the external source Geobanner.adultfriendfinder.com.
Page size can be reduced by 84.7 kB (20%)
420.3 kB
335.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Fatfeet.com main page is 420.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 226.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fat Feet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 57.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.9 kB or 34% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fatfeet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (9%)
43
39
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fat Feet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fatfeet.com
125 ms
iframe_cm_18600
627 ms
hornybirds-160x600_3.jpg
81 ms
iframe_geobanner_300x250
740 ms
iframe_cm_22223
624 ms
momsbangteens-200x200_1.gif
72 ms
header.css
497 ms
density_map-1326143189.css
503 ms
density_banner.cgi
526 ms
ffadult-density_map-1328913018.js
503 ms
tgL6TnutaFXemKqOO52i7Q.jpg
175 ms
logo.gif
100 ms
join.gif
102 ms
findSingles.gif
100 ms
wm3CdHSCXtUS3Cc2JIrnpQ.jpg
107 ms
piclist_profile2.png
106 ms
oKRbn5iTFla3b8aPRPUKuQ.jpg
108 ms
fWzl9CDxCFyiZyqodBeSPQw.jpg
107 ms
disclaimer.gif
108 ms
logo.gif
108 ms
button.gif
115 ms
density_banner.cgi
554 ms
logo_medium.gif
85 ms
bg_gradient.png
85 ms
80007484_60320.26065003.gallery.gif
149 ms
_self.html
155 ms
8Mx5egQmSVX2mcxNj0aoSPw.jpg
81 ms
Xq9ZaZHzoTxWIssJhSLTx8Q.jpg
75 ms
v2SLI9fitbjOjQtk2LyipSLA.jpg
77 ms
f8epV86loSPVeerbpQOIMeg.jpg
75 ms
TbCqXYY3N3d70Sdw6PvT7A.jpg
79 ms
med_shw.png
77 ms
-77_39_4_17_6_1.js
374 ms
SsKWPGJmSPDkGylMpZ0K3rA.jpg
26 ms
rrDBpyiT03B1S4Az6fIwRQ.jpg
29 ms
_self.html
74 ms
JSZl5y9svsVozlbfsXjqBg.jpg
30 ms
NZtlM169pwIJXyKC4aiBMg.jpg
27 ms
OEDMOF1t4vdCeJgUEBrVwg.jpg
31 ms
1pSgtcN75KUdaNjdKAITcg.jpg
27 ms
Mn9yY5QtBqZpHzPnc6SLKuA.jpg
28 ms
XSP0jRpcdDIYF8g54TomnDw.jpg
50 ms
Wt0QYtkSP3k4LaYuL5g22VA.jpg
52 ms
-77_39_6_17_3_2.js
213 ms
fatfeet.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
fatfeet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
fatfeet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fatfeet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fatfeet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fatfeet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fat Feet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: