Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

868 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

647 ms

fatfractal.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fatfractal content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fatfractal.com

FatFractal Revolution

Visit fatfractal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fatfractal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 868 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fatfractal.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

fatfractal.com

868 ms

css

55 ms

flexslider.css

18 ms

ut.portfolio.style.css

19 ms

prettyPhoto.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 109 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Fatfractal.com, 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (868 ms) belongs to the original domain Fatfractal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 948.6 kB (42%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Fatfractal.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 69.9 kB

  • Original 82.5 kB
  • After minification 68.6 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 13.9 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 33.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fatfractal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 501.3 kB

  • Original 710.6 kB
  • After minification 662.6 kB
  • After compression 209.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 501.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 343.6 kB

  • Original 393.5 kB
  • After minification 306.4 kB
  • After compression 49.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fatfractal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 343.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 61 (60%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

40

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fatfractal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

fatfractal.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fatfractal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Fatfractal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fatfractal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: