Tools & Wizards About Us
fcall.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

fcall.in

fcall.in

Page Load Speed

780 ms in total

First Response

55 ms

Resources Loaded

400 ms

Page Rendered

325 ms

fcall.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fcall content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fcall.in

Free Calls,Free Recharge,Free Sms,Make Free Call,Send Free Sms,Free Recharge Website,Free Mobile Rechage,Earn Recharge,Free Online Recharge,Send Free SMS,Free SMS to India, Send Free SMS to India, Fre...

Visit fcall.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Fcall.in page load time and found that the first response time was 55 ms and then it took 725 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Fcall.in rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

fcall.in performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.1 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value120 ms

97/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.132

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fcall.in

55 ms

www.fcall.in

77 ms

css

39 ms

style.css

26 ms

css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Fcall.in, 16% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 12% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (77 ms) belongs to the original domain Fcall.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 235.9 kB (44%)

Content Size

538.1 kB

After Optimization

302.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fcall.in main page is 538.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 229.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 14.0 kB
  • After minification 14.0 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 229.7 kB
  • After minification 193.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fcall needs image optimization as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 98.8 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 156.7 kB
  • After compression 57.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 91.0 kB

  • Original 137.7 kB
  • After minification 136.9 kB
  • After compression 46.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fcall.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.0 kB or 66% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (47%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fcall. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fcall.in

fcall.in

55 ms

www.fcall.in

www.fcall.in

77 ms

css

css

39 ms

style.css

style.css

26 ms

css

css

38 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

19 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

8 ms

css

css

52 ms

global.js

global.js

24 ms

home.js

home.js

23 ms

images.png

images.png

45 ms

free%20call.png

free%20call.png

45 ms

Free%20Sms.png

Free%20Sms.png

45 ms

free%20recharge.png

free%20recharge.png

45 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

42 ms

fcall_logo1.png

fcall_logo1.png

20 ms

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

nj47mAZe0mYUIySgfn0wpQ.ttf

21 ms

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

DvlFBScY1r-FMtZSYIYoYw.ttf

21 ms

42GGjxo0e8TfXWJDWAAAAAAFUhzzUAAA=

42GGjxo0e8TfXWJDWAAAAAAFUhzzUAAA=

4 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

51 ms

WxzDAY6mC9v3znSJEtCoW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

WxzDAY6mC9v3znSJEtCoW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

20 ms

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf

20 ms

collect

collect

41 ms

collect

collect

59 ms

fontello.ttf

fontello.ttf

47 ms

Accessibility Review

fcall.in accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

fcall.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

fcall.in SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fcall.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Fcall.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fcall.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fcall. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: