4.3 sec in total
357 ms
3.8 sec
179 ms
Visit feedcat.net now to see the best up-to-date FEEDCAT content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about feedcat.net
RSS Feed and ATOM Feed Boosting Engine
Visit feedcat.netWe analyzed Feedcat.net page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
feedcat.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value5.4 s
21/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.509
16/100
15%
Value49.3 s
0/100
10%
357 ms
313 ms
128 ms
190 ms
131 ms
Our browser made a total of 127 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Feedcat.net, 14% (18 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (4 requests) were made to Pixel.quantserve.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Widget.quantcast.com.
Page size can be reduced by 404.8 kB (62%)
650.8 kB
246.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedcat.net main page is 650.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 537.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FEEDCAT needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 345.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 345.6 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 38.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedcat.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 38.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (56%)
126
56
The browser has sent 126 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FEEDCAT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.feedcat.net
357 ms
jquery.min.js
313 ms
auto.js
128 ms
global.css
190 ms
home.css
131 ms
wb.css
131 ms
sg1.css
130 ms
sgc.js
250 ms
atrk.js
31 ms
button.js
198 ms
fi12.gif
62 ms
sright.gif
64 ms
fi16.gif
64 ms
pro16.gif
64 ms
tryit.gif
64 ms
rd2.gif
64 ms
btx1.gif
124 ms
btx2.gif
127 ms
btx3.gif
125 ms
btx4.gif
126 ms
btx5.gif
129 ms
btx6.gif
128 ms
btx7.gif
192 ms
rightpanel.gif
306 ms
atrk.gif
32 ms
quant.js
21 ms
dv.gif
186 ms
hlogo.gif
186 ms
fo_dtt.gif
186 ms
msip.gif
185 ms
bcksel.gif
246 ms
htop.gif
342 ms
226 ms
328 ms
clico.gif
230 ms
hbtn.gif
229 ms
test.png
263 ms
widget.buzzgalaxy.v1.js
102 ms
pixel;r=1082697187;a=p-46yAnNWQbrsC2;fpan=1;fpa=P0-1103150387-1456748972284;ns=0;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456748972284;tzo=-180;ref=;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feedcat.net%2F;ogl=
7 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
collect
13 ms
7
98 ms
3
82 ms
26 ms
widgetImage
2730 ms
26 ms
widgetImage
2653 ms
json.js
290 ms
button.css
64 ms
atrk.gif
26 ms
bx2.gif
63 ms
bxb.gif
64 ms
addtomyyahoo.gif
66 ms
addngsub.gif
68 ms
addmyaol.gif
69 ms
addnetvibes.gif
70 ms
addgoogle.gif
123 ms
addpageflakes.gif
124 ms
addbitty.gif
125 ms
addlive.gif
127 ms
addym.gif
129 ms
addrojo.gif
130 ms
addbl.gif
184 ms
addplusmo.gif
184 ms
addfl.gif
186 ms
addfd.gif
186 ms
addna.gif
189 ms
addmix.gif
189 ms
addao.gif
244 ms
addww.gif
246 ms
addhub.gif
247 ms
adddr.gif
248 ms
addpr.gif
250 ms
addflurry.gif
249 ms
delicious.png
305 ms
facebook.gif
306 ms
digg.gif
308 ms
live.gif
308 ms
stumbleupon.gif
310 ms
technorati.png
309 ms
misterwong.png
365 ms
mixx.png
366 ms
newsvine.png
369 ms
furl.gif
368 ms
goog.png
370 ms
collect
3 ms
myspace.png
363 ms
test.png
90 ms
pixel;r=725592001;a=p-46yAnNWQbrsC2;fpan=0;fpa=P0-1103150387-1456748972284;ns=1;ce=1;cm=;je=0;sr=1024x768x32;enc=n;dst=0;et=1456748972635;tzo=-180;ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feedcat.net%2F;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.feedcat.net%2Fen%2Fwidget%2Fnewest_feeds_on_feedcat_net%2F;ogl=
5 ms
reddit.gif
369 ms
squidoo.gif
368 ms
logoW.gif
369 ms
emailW.gif
367 ms
bxdiv.gif
368 ms
printW.gif
366 ms
hash
159 ms
emailfW.gif
368 ms
chartW.gif
370 ms
rssW.gif
368 ms
closeW.gif
367 ms
hostgatorcent.gif
426 ms
sdk.js
543 ms
141 ms
184 ms
xd_arbiter.php
210 ms
xd_arbiter.php
414 ms
post.php
199 ms
b6KRNFzKpcz.css
289 ms
4SdJwCnTSq3.css
356 ms
6anOZD6vugu.css
490 ms
XxW80wE8xXB.css
501 ms
HRmq9d9FqoF.css
559 ms
WBfRZkHE5ec.css
566 ms
_rx8naC75Dy.js
627 ms
x5F9OMjKyLw.js
649 ms
ICDbTSzjQEg.js
557 ms
b_6HNn_J2BZ.js
557 ms
7cm7D75Y0Sf.js
690 ms
rFmE1g6Dkoz.js
823 ms
336JejShbZp.js
648 ms
njO1TPvGzoR.js
663 ms
TTCre3391I0.js
702 ms
935283_558675437510526_1634649532_n.jpg
317 ms
safe_image.php
293 ms
QDwYpIaRyfG.png
80 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
68 ms
vlXaquuXMrr.js
70 ms
feedcat.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
feedcat.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
feedcat.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedcat.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feedcat.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedcat.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FEEDCAT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: