Tools & Wizards About Us
feedink.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

feedink.com

feedlink | Feedink

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

764 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

229 ms

feedink.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Feedink content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feedink.com

Poznaj nasze możliwości. Pliki produktowe są niezbędne dla najbardziej konwertujących kanałów. Nasz system pozwoli Ci nimi zarządzać

Visit feedink.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Feedink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feedink.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,440 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feedink.com

764 ms

jquery.js

12 ms

bootstrap.min.css

183 ms

custom.css

194 ms

font-awesome.css

28 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Feedink.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Pixel.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedink.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (76%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

381.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Feedink.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 20.9 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 27.4 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 154.0 kB
  • After minification 149.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feedink images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 267.0 kB

  • Original 399.4 kB
  • After minification 354.7 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 929.8 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 927.1 kB
  • After compression 92.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 929.8 kB or 91% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

feedink.com

feedink.com

764 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

12 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

183 ms

custom.css

custom.css

194 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

28 ms

widget.css

widget.css

179 ms

js_composer.css

js_composer.css

395 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

330 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

266 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

269 ms

gtm4wp-social-tracker.js

gtm4wp-social-tracker.js

270 ms

jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id.js

jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id.js

284 ms

jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id-init.js

jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id-init.js

352 ms

js_composer_front.js

js_composer_front.js

363 ms

modernizr.js

modernizr.js

362 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

373 ms

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js

418 ms

send-form.js

send-form.js

439 ms

css

css

66 ms

timeline.css

timeline.css

262 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

196 ms

logo-page.svg

logo-page.svg

224 ms

lang-white.png

lang-white.png

127 ms

en-big.png

en-big.png

126 ms

pl-big.png

pl-big.png

127 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

124 ms

home-bg.jpg

home-bg.jpg

403 ms

btn-img.svg

btn-img.svg

116 ms

companies.png

companies.png

365 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

89 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

104 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

138 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

138 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

196 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

180 ms

dc.js

dc.js

80 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

44 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

40 ms

52829c40266b2f456a000003.js

52829c40266b2f456a000003.js

81 ms

watch.js

watch.js

210 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

38 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

72 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

126 ms

111 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

15 ms

137 ms

tagjs

tagjs

67 ms

116 ms

121 ms

110 ms

watch.js

watch.js

459 ms

adsct

adsct

161 ms

Pug

Pug

135 ms

ncm

ncm

53 ms

cb

cb

45 ms

cb

cb

13 ms

tap.php

tap.php

27 ms

sd

sd

42 ms

cb

cb

4 ms

Accessibility Review

feedink.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

feedink.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

feedink.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    PL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Feedink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

feedink.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: