3.2 sec in total
764 ms
2.2 sec
229 ms
Click here to check amazing Feedink content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feedink.com
Poznaj nasze możliwości. Pliki produktowe są niezbędne dla najbardziej konwertujących kanałów. Nasz system pozwoli Ci nimi zarządzać
Visit feedink.comWe analyzed Feedink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 764 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
feedink.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value4.9 s
66/100
10%
Value1,440 ms
15/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value8.6 s
37/100
10%
764 ms
12 ms
183 ms
194 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Feedink.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Pixel.prfct.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (764 ms) belongs to the original domain Feedink.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (76%)
1.6 MB
381.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Feedink.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 20.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feedink images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 267.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 929.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feedink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 929.8 kB or 91% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (85%)
52
8
The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feedink. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
feedink.com
764 ms
jquery.js
12 ms
bootstrap.min.css
183 ms
custom.css
194 ms
font-awesome.css
28 ms
widget.css
179 ms
js_composer.css
395 ms
jquery.js
330 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
266 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
269 ms
gtm4wp-social-tracker.js
270 ms
jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id.js
284 ms
jquery.malihu.PageScroll2id-init.js
352 ms
js_composer_front.js
363 ms
modernizr.js
362 ms
bootstrap.min.js
373 ms
ie10-viewport-bug-workaround.js
418 ms
send-form.js
439 ms
css
66 ms
timeline.css
262 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
196 ms
logo-page.svg
224 ms
lang-white.png
127 ms
en-big.png
126 ms
pl-big.png
127 ms
gtm.js
124 ms
home-bg.jpg
403 ms
btn-img.svg
116 ms
companies.png
365 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
89 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
104 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
138 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
138 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
196 ms
widgets.js
180 ms
dc.js
80 ms
conversion_async.js
44 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
52829c40266b2f456a000003.js
81 ms
watch.js
210 ms
fbds.js
38 ms
fbevents.js
72 ms
collect
45 ms
126 ms
111 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
137 ms
tagjs
67 ms
116 ms
121 ms
110 ms
watch.js
459 ms
adsct
161 ms
Pug
135 ms
ncm
53 ms
cb
45 ms
cb
13 ms
tap.php
27 ms
sd
42 ms
cb
4 ms
feedink.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
feedink.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
feedink.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feedink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Feedink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
feedink.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feedink. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: