2.1 sec in total
682 ms
1.1 sec
241 ms
Visit filefac.com now to see the best up-to-date Filefac content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filefac.com
Online LLC filing for as low as $69! High client satisfaction. Get started and form your LLC today! Filefac National LLC Filing Services.
Visit filefac.comWe analyzed Filefac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 682 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
filefac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value31.2 s
0/100
25%
Value15.8 s
0/100
10%
Value860 ms
33/100
30%
Value0.01
100/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
682 ms
60 ms
58 ms
58 ms
19 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Filefac.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (682 ms) belongs to the original domain Filefac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 922.3 kB (29%)
3.2 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Filefac.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filefac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 477.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 477.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 337.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filefac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 337.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (78%)
50
11
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filefac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
filefac.com
682 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
60 ms
wpapp-styles.css
58 ms
styles.css
58 ms
css
19 ms
bootstrap.min.css
71 ms
prettyPhoto.css
67 ms
style-shortcodes.css
86 ms
style.css
122 ms
font-awesome.min.css
98 ms
font-awesome.min.css
6 ms
dashicons.min.css
134 ms
style-portfolio.css
128 ms
default.min.css
129 ms
style-responsive.css
130 ms
jquery.js
166 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
153 ms
jquery.sticky.js
159 ms
jquery.videoBG.js
162 ms
jquery.tweetscroll.js
178 ms
css
13 ms
post-like.js
155 ms
plusone.js
45 ms
in.js
7 ms
widgets.js
5 ms
scripts.js
219 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
220 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
220 ms
main-frontend.js
222 ms
bootstrap.js
224 ms
modernizr.js
226 ms
waypoints.min.js
266 ms
waypoints-sticky.min.js
266 ms
jquery.scrollUp.min.js
266 ms
responsiveslides.min.js
266 ms
responsiveslides-call.js
267 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
267 ms
jquery.knob.js
266 ms
wp-embed.min.js
309 ms
sdk.js
82 ms
FileFac-Logo.png
159 ms
transparent.png
159 ms
parallax2.png
299 ms
RA-300x200.jpg
159 ms
incorporate-300x200.jpg
159 ms
paperwork-300x203.jpg
257 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
161 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
159 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
95 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTRa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
144 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSha1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
145 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzBa1RVmPjeKy21_GQJaLlJI.woff
146 ms
2NBgzUtEeyB-Xtpr9bm1CZa6Tn9fxpDPuRSK4Gn5Ybw.woff
145 ms
UC3ZEjagJi85gF9qFaBgIDTx0bvFePwcBpOqDg3uc64.woff
145 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
87 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
193 ms
150 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
59 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
105 ms
filefac.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
filefac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
filefac.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filefac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filefac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filefac.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filefac. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: