Tools & Wizards About Us
filefol.io screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

filefol.io

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

347 ms

filefol.io screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filefol content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filefol.io

Filefolio let's designers hand over approved work to clients online. Easily upload images, fonts, color swatches, documents or access codes and share it with your clients.

Visit filefol.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Filefol.io page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filefol.io performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

filefol.io

223 ms

site_global.css

85 ms

master_a-master.css

147 ms

index.css

149 ms

museutils.js

181 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Filefol.io, 16% (6 requests) were made to Webfonts.creativecloud.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Filefol.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 99.9 kB (27%)

Content Size

373.1 kB

After Optimization

273.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filefol.io main page is 373.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 243.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 13.7 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.0 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 243.5 kB
  • After minification 225.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filefol images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 61.0 kB

  • Original 102.6 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 41.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 10.4 kB

  • Original 13.2 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 2.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filefol.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (41%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filefol. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filefol.io

filefol.io

223 ms

site_global.css

site_global.css

85 ms

master_a-master.css

master_a-master.css

147 ms

index.css

index.css

149 ms

museutils.js

museutils.js

181 ms

jquery.tobrowserwidth.js

jquery.tobrowserwidth.js

170 ms

webpro.js

webpro.js

175 ms

musewpslideshow.js

musewpslideshow.js

161 ms

jquery.museoverlay.js

jquery.museoverlay.js

255 ms

touchswipe.js

touchswipe.js

251 ms

jquery.musepolyfill.bgsize.js

jquery.musepolyfill.bgsize.js

254 ms

jquery.watch.js

jquery.watch.js

254 ms

lato:n4,n3,n7,n9:all.js

lato:n4,n3,n7,n9:all.js

54 ms

filefol.io

filefol.io

188 ms

filefolio-logo.png

filefolio-logo.png

100 ms

filefolio-icon.png

filefolio-icon.png

107 ms

detail-file-type.png

detail-file-type.png

107 ms

detail-tootip.png

detail-tootip.png

89 ms

detail-rgb-cmyk.png

detail-rgb-cmyk.png

89 ms

detail-branding.png

detail-branding.png

105 ms

monitor.png

monitor.png

281 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

169 ms

filefolio-logo-white.png

filefolio-logo-white.png

214 ms

ga.js

ga.js

23 ms

form-textfield.png

form-textfield.png

115 ms

form-normal.png

form-normal.png

115 ms

filefolio-screenshot.jpg

filefolio-screenshot.jpg

323 ms

JmphYy-RORVk_QPXirf1ykKzpenTFg6OnioW4OOCVL3ffH7qgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ62.woff

JmphYy-RORVk_QPXirf1ykKzpenTFg6OnioW4OOCVL3ffH7qgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ62.woff

166 ms

zu2eXF54iw8fKeRtT5WBmjZkWdvWF1lmqQHVtusYzqwffHkqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ6I.woff

zu2eXF54iw8fKeRtT5WBmjZkWdvWF1lmqQHVtusYzqwffHkqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ6I.woff

310 ms

7QE5q4QNJdLXYt1G1p9izSO5uSakX9VpqXyBM4I9jgwffOeqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ6Y.woff

7QE5q4QNJdLXYt1G1p9izSO5uSakX9VpqXyBM4I9jgwffOeqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ6Y.woff

284 ms

IY2v1mx5jaytiENOEbD9aZlOP5Iha6pvtE4mDsI8LaGffOAqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ64.woff

IY2v1mx5jaytiENOEbD9aZlOP5Iha6pvtE4mDsI8LaGffOAqgsMdeMJ6Mk6gwyTaZA4cdhoXSkoRScmyie8hZAFCdamqOcFzdQ64.woff

298 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

29 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

67 ms

screen-wireframes.jpg

screen-wireframes.jpg

133 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

92 ms

p.gif

p.gif

129 ms

screen-corporate-identity.jpg

screen-corporate-identity.jpg

131 ms

SEO Factors

filefol.io SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filefol.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Filefol.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filefol.io

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filefol. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: