2.7 sec in total
433 ms
1.7 sec
518 ms
Visit filemarker.net now to see the best up-to-date File Marker content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filemarker.net
A handy tool that allows o color-code or image-code files of the same type in Windows like in Mac and considerably simplify file management with the help of additional icons to display status, priorit...
Visit filemarker.netWe analyzed Filemarker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 433 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
filemarker.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
91/100
10%
Value4.0 s
50/100
25%
Value2.3 s
99/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value4.2 s
86/100
10%
433 ms
285 ms
289 ms
226 ms
303 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Filemarker.net, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Cdn.sendpulse.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (962 ms) belongs to the original domain Filemarker.net.
Page size can be reduced by 94.3 kB (24%)
391.0 kB
296.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Filemarker.net main page is 391.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 298.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 7.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 33.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, File Marker needs image optimization as it can save up to 33.5 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 13.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filemarker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
16
16
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Marker. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
filemarker.net
433 ms
styles.css
285 ms
styles_new.css
289 ms
5fb5f51660f618442e1bcee00535e4ac_0.js
226 ms
jquery-1.6.2.min.js
303 ms
jquery.tools.min.js
304 ms
logo.jpg
373 ms
scr_FMN_Pro-Window1-Green.png
418 ms
scr_FMN_Pro-Window2-Green.png
419 ms
scr_FMN_Pro-Window4-Green.png
418 ms
scr_FMN_ProMenu-Green.png
437 ms
head.jpg
684 ms
head_menu_sep.jpg
633 ms
head_menu_arrow.png
795 ms
download_now.jpg
962 ms
benefits_background.jpg
802 ms
li.jpg
808 ms
analytics.js
80 ms
collect
69 ms
filemarker.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
filemarker.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
filemarker.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filemarker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filemarker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
filemarker.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Marker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: