Tools & Wizards About Us
filetrack.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

filetrack.com

Embershot

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

358 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

94 ms

filetrack.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Filetrack content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filetrack.com

Visit filetrack.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filetrack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filetrack.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

filetrack.com

358 ms

login.aspx

352 ms

md5.js

83 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

200 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.js

623 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (18 requests) were addressed to the original Filetrack.com, 10% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Crypto-js.googlecode.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (623 ms) belongs to the original domain Filetrack.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 411.4 kB (76%)

Content Size

540.4 kB

After Optimization

129.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filetrack.com main page is 540.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 327.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 17.9 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 132.0 kB

  • Original 150.8 kB
  • After minification 18.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Filetrack needs image optimization as it can save up to 132.0 kB or 88% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 231.3 kB

  • Original 327.5 kB
  • After minification 327.4 kB
  • After compression 96.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 231.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 34.8 kB

  • Original 43.3 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filetrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filetrack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filetrack.com

filetrack.com

358 ms

login.aspx

login.aspx

352 ms

md5.js

md5.js

83 ms

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

jquery-1.10.2.min.js

200 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.3.min.js

623 ms

scriptit.css

scriptit.css

264 ms

login.css

login.css

220 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css

328 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

66 ms

logo2015_60.png

logo2015_60.png

152 ms

bigrotation.gif

bigrotation.gif

68 ms

appstore.png

appstore.png

69 ms

googleplay.png

googleplay.png

132 ms

ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png

ui-bg_glass_75_e6e6e6_1x400.png

69 ms

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png

139 ms

ui-icons_222222_256x240.png

ui-icons_222222_256x240.png

138 ms

ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png

ui-bg_highlight-soft_75_cccccc_1x100.png

138 ms

ui-icons_888888_256x240.png

ui-icons_888888_256x240.png

172 ms

ui-bg_flat_0_aaaaaa_40x100.png

ui-bg_flat_0_aaaaaa_40x100.png

194 ms

ui-bg_glass_75_dadada_1x400.png

ui-bg_glass_75_dadada_1x400.png

198 ms

SEO Factors

filetrack.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filetrack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filetrack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filetrack.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filetrack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: