Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

filtered.com

Content under control. Skills strategy unblocked. | Filtered

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

242 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

filtered.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to filtered.com homepage info - get ready to check Filtered best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about filtered.com

Get the best return on your L&D spend with Filtered's Content Intelligence. Filter the right content, for the skills your people really need.

Visit filtered.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filtered.com page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filtered.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,270 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.386

27/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.3 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

filtered.com

242 ms

filtered.com

565 ms

reset.css

114 ms

styles.css

237 ms

header.css

289 ms

Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Filtered.com, 16% (17 requests) were made to Cdn2.hubspot.net and 14% (15 requests) were made to Learn.filtered.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Cdn2.hubspot.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 883.6 kB (27%)

Content Size

3.3 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Filtered.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 107.6 kB
  • After minification 105.3 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 104.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filtered images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 573.7 kB

  • Original 904.0 kB
  • After minification 890.7 kB
  • After compression 330.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 573.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 125.2 kB

  • Original 151.2 kB
  • After minification 120.1 kB
  • After compression 26.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtered.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (45%)

Requests Now

101

After Optimization

56

The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtered. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

filtered.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

filtered.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

filtered.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filtered.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Filtered.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Filtered. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: