3.7 sec in total
855 ms
2.7 sec
232 ms
Click here to check amazing Finevisit content for Belarus. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about finevisit.com
Visit finevisit.comWe analyzed Finevisit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 855 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
finevisit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.6 s
88/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value4.8 s
79/100
10%
855 ms
24 ms
569 ms
1026 ms
775 ms
Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Finevisit.com, 17% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Finevisit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 261.0 kB (57%)
461.1 kB
200.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Finevisit.com main page is 461.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 197.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Finevisit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 128.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.1 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 114.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finevisit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (25%)
12
9
The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finevisit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
finevisit.com
855 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
569 ms
animate.css
1026 ms
style.css
775 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
1294 ms
plugins.js
1315 ms
app.js
723 ms
logo2-icon.png
857 ms
11.jpg
1811 ms
22.jpg
1288 ms
33.jpg
1382 ms
logo-footer2.png
1513 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJbfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
6 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37Zp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
11 ms
dazS1PrQQuCxC3iOAJFEJZ_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
12 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
729 ms
icomoon.woff
493 ms
finevisit.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
finevisit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
finevisit.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Finevisit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Finevisit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
finevisit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Finevisit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: