Tools & Wizards About Us
flightdiary.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 48

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 74

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

flightdiary.net

myFlightradar24

Page Load Speed

899 ms in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

536 ms

Page Rendered

164 ms

flightdiary.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to flightdiary.net homepage info - get ready to check Flightdiary best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about flightdiary.net

Visit flightdiary.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Flightdiary.net page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 700 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flightdiary.net performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value80 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.329

35/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

my.flightradar24.com

199 ms

jquery.min.js

53 ms

css

90 ms

font-awesome.min.css

52 ms

screen.css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Flightdiary.net, 15% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (199 ms) relates to the external source My.flightradar24.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 301.6 kB (28%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

782.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flightdiary.net main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 647.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 21.8 kB
  • After minification 19.3 kB
  • After compression 5.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.8 kB

  • Original 647.1 kB
  • After minification 627.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flightdiary images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 80.0 kB

  • Original 193.7 kB
  • After minification 192.2 kB
  • After compression 113.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 185.5 kB

  • Original 221.3 kB
  • After minification 194.1 kB
  • After compression 35.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightdiary.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 185.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (50%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flightdiary. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

my.flightradar24.com

my.flightradar24.com

199 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

css

css

90 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

52 ms

screen.css

screen.css

24 ms

main.js

main.js

47 ms

landing.js

landing.js

86 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

85 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

86 ms

print.css

print.css

74 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

78 ms

prum.min.js

prum.min.js

101 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

97 ms

landing_bg.jpg

landing_bg.jpg

37 ms

myfr24_logo.png

myfr24_logo.png

42 ms

header_radar_icon.png

header_radar_icon.png

37 ms

landing_browser.png

landing_browser.png

89 ms

myfr24_logo_light.png

myfr24_logo_light.png

78 ms

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

96 ms

5FbdueAKJ1eeO4CsvGhNRevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

5FbdueAKJ1eeO4CsvGhNRevvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

111 ms

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

131 ms

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

148 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

40 ms

collect

collect

56 ms

49 ms

0sTQzbapM8j.js

0sTQzbapM8j.js

37 ms

Accessibility Review

flightdiary.net accessibility score

48

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

flightdiary.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

flightdiary.net SEO score

74

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightdiary.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flightdiary.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

flightdiary.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flightdiary. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: