8.1 sec in total
1.1 sec
6.8 sec
172 ms
Visit flirtru.ru now to see the best up-to-date FLIRT RU content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flirtru.ru
Visit flirtru.ruWe analyzed Flirtru.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
flirtru.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value2.5 s
90/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value8,190 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.158
74/100
15%
Value19.9 s
2/100
10%
1096 ms
366 ms
2073 ms
711 ms
465 ms
Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Flirtru.ru, 72% (75 requests) were made to Cdneu.wambacdn.net and 4% (4 requests) were made to Img2.ru.redtram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Img2.ru.redtram.com.
Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (64%)
4.6 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Flirtru.ru main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 240.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 43.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 240.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 86.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FLIRT RU needs image optimization as it can save up to 86.6 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 919.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 919.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flirtru.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (59%)
101
41
The browser has sent 101 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FLIRT RU. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flirtru.ru
1096 ms
Stats.min.js
366 ms
base.css
2073 ms
style.css
711 ms
layers.css
465 ms
ui-userbar.css
468 ms
SearchForm.css
875 ms
slider.css
456 ms
NewFaces.css
620 ms
MainTop.css
634 ms
UserFace2.css
732 ms
style518986.css
701 ms
lib_versions.js
889 ms
routes.js
783 ms
polyfill.js
790 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
924 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
863 ms
lodash.4.2.1.compat.min.js
885 ms
knockout-3.2.0.js
1178 ms
rx.all.compat.js
1199 ms
bowser.js
982 ms
require.js
984 ms
code.js
1116 ms
config.js
1106 ms
components.js
2498 ms
web.full.css
1192 ms
icons.css
1421 ms
icons.css
2052 ms
stickers.css
1278 ms
en.js
1290 ms
core.js
1721 ms
moment.js
1382 ms
angular.min.js
1573 ms
angular-resource.min.js
1506 ms
Modal.js
1595 ms
mamba-app.js
1665 ms
paymentMethods.js
1683 ms
flirtru.ru.js
374 ms
advert.js
1405 ms
vipModule.js
1323 ms
photolineModule.js
1351 ms
bootstrap-datepicker.js
1395 ms
maketopModule.js
1243 ms
applicationChargeModule.js
1264 ms
giftModule.js
1252 ms
leaderModule.js
1228 ms
1565953655_square.jpg
206 ms
1560296605_square.jpg
208 ms
1571907624_square.jpg
217 ms
1580795800_square.jpg
204 ms
1584120300_square.jpg
208 ms
1594579365_square.jpg
206 ms
top100.cnt
266 ms
logofon.gif
454 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif
257 ms
339.gif
2167 ms
36.gif
457 ms
l3.gif
109 ms
icon_1.png
108 ms
icon_11.png
109 ms
icon_13.png
108 ms
icon_14.png
111 ms
icon_2.png
110 ms
1.jpg
256 ms
flirtru
582 ms
t.bbn
383 ms
icon_menu-new.png
272 ms
Login.js
94 ms
arrowSearch.sprite.svg
97 ms
photos.png
92 ms
mark-online.png
89 ms
new_faces_reload.jpg
150 ms
icon_reload.png
157 ms
arrows.png
167 ms
circleOnline.small.svg
168 ms
camera.sprite.svg
175 ms
cup.png
217 ms
icons16.png
286 ms
icons13.png
227 ms
base.png
227 ms
registration-sprite.png
501 ms
Registration.js
279 ms
socialButton.png
279 ms
adt.sprite.svg
479 ms
Select.js
568 ms
hit
251 ms
AuthStatusMonitor.js
456 ms
n4p.ru.redtram.com
247 ms
1779663891.jpg
2601 ms
1779315052.jpg
2601 ms
1816363051.jpg
2601 ms
1819720702.jpg
2606 ms
88.gif
371 ms
init.js
153 ms
code.js
688 ms
velocity.js
182 ms
init.js
472 ms
Mambarber.js
354 ms
slider-handle.png
139 ms
invisible.sprite.svg
285 ms
noPhoto.sprite.svg
383 ms
SynchroMambaTab.js
153 ms
counter
342 ms
tracker
159 ms
flirtru.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
flirtru.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
flirtru.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flirtru.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flirtru.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flirtru.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FLIRT RU. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: