Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

flood.firetree.net

Flood Maps

Page Load Speed

9.2 sec in total

First Response

531 ms

Resources Loaded

8.5 sec

Page Rendered

213 ms

flood.firetree.net screenshot

About Website

Visit flood.firetree.net now to see the best up-to-date Flood Firetree content for Moldova and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flood.firetree.net

Dynamic maps of sea level rise. Will global warming affect you?

Visit flood.firetree.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Flood.firetree.net page load time and found that the first response time was 531 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flood.firetree.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,530 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.182

67/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

40/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flood.firetree.net

531 ms

js

46 ms

common.js

180 ms

flood.js

185 ms

screen.css

207 ms

Our browser made a total of 125 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Flood.firetree.net, 37% (46 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (640 ms) belongs to the original domain Flood.firetree.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 391.1 kB (34%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

772.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Flood.firetree.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 602.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 54.8 kB

  • Original 64.3 kB
  • After minification 63.8 kB
  • After compression 9.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

  • Original 602.3 kB
  • After minification 591.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flood Firetree images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 321.1 kB

  • Original 491.5 kB
  • After minification 485.3 kB
  • After compression 170.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 321.1 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flood.firetree.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (55%)

Requests Now

119

After Optimization

54

The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flood Firetree. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

flood.firetree.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

flood.firetree.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

flood.firetree.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flood.firetree.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flood.firetree.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flood Firetree. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: