3.7 sec in total
370 ms
2.3 sec
1.1 sec
Visit flyingfairy.cool now to see the best up-to-date Flyingfairy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flyingfairy.cool
Visit flyingfairy.coolWe analyzed Flyingfairy.cool page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
flyingfairy.cool performance score
370 ms
181 ms
176 ms
82 ms
111 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Flyingfairy.cool, 33% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (934 ms) belongs to the original domain Flyingfairy.cool.
Page size can be reduced by 664.5 kB (35%)
1.9 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Flyingfairy.cool main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flyingfairy images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 410.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 410.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flyingfairy.cool needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (53%)
32
15
The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flyingfairy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flyingfairy.cool
370 ms
reset.css
181 ms
css.css
176 ms
css
82 ms
css
111 ms
jquery.js
830 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
181 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
279 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
180 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
276 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
278 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
278 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
278 ms
style.css
364 ms
countdown.js
369 ms
headerbg.jpg
373 ms
logo.png
146 ms
girl.png
934 ms
sticker.png
146 ms
bl_girls.jpg
379 ms
bl_woman.jpg
281 ms
chk.jpg
169 ms
items.jpg
286 ms
bl_delivery.jpg
282 ms
cli_1.jpg
451 ms
cli_3.jpg
372 ms
cli_2.jpg
459 ms
oCCmYkM2XWI
179 ms
msNrBgwx3ln3jjNy5b_Syw.ttf
83 ms
kTYfCWJhlldPf5LnG4ZnHC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
151 ms
h1hNI9JfdOQ7_cRvyZ43W_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
147 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsBlK56C0jDUcaMq2nBMyj2w.ttf
145 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nB7rguocifnj7QSqismEHq4.ttf
146 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nIMGPh8WWbI7EgnO6KVsZnk.ttf
147 ms
77FXFjRbGzN4aCrSFhlh3qCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
144 ms
s7gftie1JANC-QmDJvMWZqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
159 ms
ZLqKeelYbATG60EpZBSDy6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
155 ms
oeEVQYYBjVpg-nn8NItjTw.ttf
151 ms
0eC6fl06luXEYWpBSJvXCKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
148 ms
AnLqAmUHVxLQe4DPCqWhIPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
152 ms
GpWpM_6S4VQLPNAQ3iWvVaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
206 ms
lILlYDvubYemzYzN7GbLkGeP1y_Bkidl4ESyB_O2G_c.ttf
205 ms
www-embed-player-vfl-z2BtK.css
224 ms
www-embed-player.js
268 ms
base.js
377 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
80 ms
ad_status.js
150 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
134 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
144 ms
flyingfairy.cool SEO score
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flyingfairy.cool can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flyingfairy.cool main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flyingfairy.cool
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flyingfairy. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: