3.4 sec in total
227 ms
2.6 sec
549 ms
Visit foodhoe.com now to see the best up-to-date Foodhoe content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodhoe.com
I'm hungry, what's for lunch?
Visit foodhoe.comWe analyzed Foodhoe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 227 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
foodhoe.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value6.6 s
8/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value900 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.715
7/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
227 ms
194 ms
134 ms
135 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Foodhoe.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (331 ms) belongs to the original domain Foodhoe.com.
Page size can be reduced by 334.8 kB (30%)
1.1 MB
797.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Foodhoe.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 792.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foodhoe needs image optimization as it can save up to 90.4 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 97.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.6 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 85.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodhoe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (41%)
37
22
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodhoe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.foodhoe.com
227 ms
layout.css
194 ms
custom.css
134 ms
style.css
135 ms
jetpack.css
267 ms
jquery.js
331 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
158 ms
tw-sack.min.js
200 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
56 ms
wpgroho.js
144 ms
bj-lazy-load.min.js
180 ms
wp-embed.min.js
200 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
css
23 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
194 ms
header.jpg
133 ms
dot-ddd.gif
130 ms
sabio_octopus-1.jpg
131 ms
mt_shio-1.jpg
295 ms
aub_oyster1.jpg
295 ms
wo_tableau1.jpg
129 ms
vc_kao_poun1.jpg
294 ms
mm_bs_bite.jpg
294 ms
z1JWuCBrQt_Ta83eqIo6Dg.woff
19 ms
n6RTCDcIPWSE8UNBa4k-DAjWwMcLosnYS7_elQHKBmA.woff
19 ms
5Ywdce7XEbTSbxs__4X1_LHCWPYgV_Fgx41n4RSinLs.woff
19 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
53 ms
g.gif
6 ms
chinavillage-1024x810.jpg
263 ms
somerights20.png
17 ms
15491024_fff60b1703_o.jpg
326 ms
foodiehubbadge4_sm.png
87 ms
wtle_blog_bug_white.gif
132 ms
facebook500.png
70 ms
pinterest.png
70 ms
Academy-Logo-White-web.gif
70 ms
cv_mural-1024x761.jpg
315 ms
twitter.png
70 ms
instagram500.png
136 ms
foodhoe.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
foodhoe.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
foodhoe.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodhoe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Foodhoe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodhoe.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foodhoe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: