32.9 sec in total
3.4 sec
29.1 sec
389 ms
Welcome to foodsafe.net homepage info - get ready to check Foodsafe best content right away, or after learning these important things about foodsafe.net
ÌṩHACCPÈÏÖ¤×Éѯ¡¢·¨ÂÉ·¨¹æ¼°Åàѵ½ÌÓý¡£Ãâ·Ñ×¢²á»áÔ±ºÍ·¢²¼¹©ÇóÐÅÏ¢¡£
Visit foodsafe.netWe analyzed Foodsafe.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 29.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 3 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
foodsafe.net performance score
3408 ms
3316 ms
3964 ms
1160 ms
1231 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Foodsafe.net, 12% (7 requests) were made to Pub.idqqimg.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Js.users.51.la. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Geoip.weather.com.cn.
Page size can be reduced by 66.2 kB (65%)
101.9 kB
35.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Foodsafe.net main page is 101.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 49.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foodsafe needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.4 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.6 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodsafe.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (26%)
54
40
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodsafe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodsafe.net
3408 ms
3316 ms
jquery.min.js
3964 ms
css1.css
1160 ms
jquery-fn-tab.js
1231 ms
css2.css
1021 ms
img.js
2789 ms
style.css
2244 ms
4563344.js
1059 ms
online.ww
987 ms
suhuaji.jpg
2963 ms
top.gif
469 ms
kefu.gif
431 ms
bbs_button.gif
1090 ms
bottom.gif
415 ms
20100808001.gif
3390 ms
hrbanner1.jpg
6486 ms
hrbanner2.jpg
9705 ms
hrbanner3.jpg
14710 ms
hrbanner5.jpg
19776 ms
hrbanner6.jpg
16159 ms
hrbanner7.jpg
11507 ms
tz20101201.gif
8709 ms
20100720002.gif
9478 ms
20100808002.gif
11590 ms
20100720001.gif
11684 ms
ad1.gif
13487 ms
link.gif
11961 ms
01.jpg
16287 ms
02.jpg
16515 ms
03.jpg
16871 ms
04.jpg
15924 ms
05.jpg
16804 ms
06.gif
16554 ms
07.jpg
18211 ms
middle.gif
16831 ms
ww_button.gif
16904 ms
weather.htm
540 ms
mainbg.gif
17152 ms
mainimg.gif
19219 ms
mainallbg.gif
17208 ms
nav_linkright.gif
17288 ms
nav_linkleft.gif
17524 ms
nav_space.gif
17550 ms
dot2.gif
17653 ms
20100720003.gif
18975 ms
20100720003_1.gif
19647 ms
icon_0.gif
4642 ms
dot.gif
17732 ms
mbox-tbg.png
18086 ms
dot1.gif
18103 ms
20175 ms
T1tm9.XdRnXXaHNz_X-16-16.gif
704 ms
button_old_41.gif
532 ms
button_old_41.gif
535 ms
button_old_41.gif
534 ms
button_old_41.gif
537 ms
button_old_41.gif
569 ms
button_old_41.gif
270 ms
button_old_41.gif
244 ms
foodsafe.net SEO score
N/A
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodsafe.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Foodsafe.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
foodsafe.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foodsafe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: