2.2 sec in total
38 ms
1.9 sec
262 ms
Visit foodwheel.in now to see the best up-to-date Foodwheel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodwheel.in
Visit foodwheel.inWe analyzed Foodwheel.in page load time and found that the first response time was 38 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
foodwheel.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
14/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.024
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
38 ms
87 ms
89 ms
71 ms
72 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Foodwheel.in, 18% (12 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 14% (9 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (564 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (62%)
3.6 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Foodwheel.in main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 27.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodwheel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodwheel.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (73%)
55
15
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodwheel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
foodwheel
38 ms
bt
87 ms
require.min.js
89 ms
main-r.min.js
71 ms
viewer.css
72 ms
ugc-viewer
42 ms
dynamicmodel
10 ms
8ab535_5411f930b18c11c701ebd8331ffc81da_102.json.z
399 ms
8ab535_8634db71eab2753c8de2f5c40faddf17_102.json.z
398 ms
bt
75 ms
skins.min.js
70 ms
components.min.js
182 ms
utils.min.js
180 ms
core.min.js
164 ms
react-with-addons.min.js
163 ms
lodash.min.js
47 ms
TweenMax.min.js
381 ms
layout.min.js
163 ms
tpa.min.js
379 ms
fonts.min.js
162 ms
animations.min.js
162 ms
swfobject.min.js
163 ms
mousetrap.min.js
163 ms
tweenEngine.min.js
164 ms
DrawSVGPlugin.min.js
162 ms
react-dom.min.js
163 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
163 ms
widgets.min.js
164 ms
experiment.js
164 ms
render.min.js
164 ms
wixappsCore.min.js
165 ms
wixappsClassics.min.js
166 ms
wixappsBuilder.min.js
164 ms
zepto.min.js
164 ms
color.min.js
165 ms
react-dom-server.min.js
49 ms
bt
141 ms
latin.css
106 ms
dc.js
95 ms
bt
249 ms
8ab535_5bba0c528e4d44bab65334047ca2da47.png
358 ms
wf_label_static.png
103 ms
css
101 ms
8ab535_6cfcf972451249eab861e36f6a8c9240.png
245 ms
8ab535_3a3c10beeeb04784bbee39174d205937.png
342 ms
8ab535_8a4f166055e44bf997868d9b024278a7.jpg
277 ms
8ab535_dd047e47c52c4e0c86d5c6f21b6bda06.png
226 ms
8ab535_506ada01ba7a4eb4ab44b975ebcf725a.png
295 ms
8ab535_11374fdc145043f3a94f230ecb7d9c4c.jpg
431 ms
8ab535_3075c5d918cb45da9b1a45f7c9244f9b.png
564 ms
8ab535_42bcd44278554ecca4f2f5d21d630e88.png
415 ms
bt
51 ms
bt
51 ms
bt
94 ms
BG91x1.jpg
50 ms
__utm.gif
74 ms
03805817-4611-4dbc-8c65-0f73031c3973.woff
47 ms
pEko-RqEtp45bE2P80AAKXl4twXkwp3_u9ZoePkT564.woff
30 ms
wdyV6x3eKpdeUPQ7BJ5uUHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
46 ms
c5749443-93da-4592-b794-42f28d62ef72.woff
26 ms
cc0b2292-9358-41ee-b3b9-429952586f69.woff
25 ms
28d74e9b-4ea9-4e3c-b265-c67a72c66856.woff
99 ms
ga-audiences
113 ms
ugc-viewer
37 ms
8ab535_42bcd44278554ecca4f2f5d21d630e88.png
316 ms
foodwheel.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foodwheel.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
foodwheel.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodwheel.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Foodwheel.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foodwheel.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foodwheel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: