Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

footcomfort.nl

footcomfort | Vakkundige pedicure Renate Hermans

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

256 ms

footcomfort.nl screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Footcomfort content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about footcomfort.nl

Visit footcomfort.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Footcomfort.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

footcomfort.nl performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.9 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.504

16/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

38/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

footcomfort.nl

212 ms

menu.html

95 ms

home.html

185 ms

footcomfort.css

280 ms

Foot_Comfort1.gif

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Footcomfort.nl and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (903 ms) belongs to the original domain Footcomfort.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 kB (80%)

Content Size

3.7 kB

After Optimization

746 B

In fact, the total size of Footcomfort.nl main page is 3.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 3.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 104 B

  • Original 318 B
  • After minification 315 B
  • After compression 214 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104 B or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 2.4 kB
  • After compression 532 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footcomfort.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Footcomfort. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

footcomfort.nl accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

footcomfort.nl best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

footcomfort.nl SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footcomfort.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Footcomfort.nl main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Footcomfort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: