4.5 sec in total
558 ms
2.9 sec
1.1 sec
Click here to check amazing Footroll content for Poland. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about footroll.pl
To tylko piłka nożna - portal piłkarski zawierający newsy, podsumowania, statystyki, memy, typy, bramki, skróty - wszystko, czego kibic futbolu może oczekiwać od piłkarskiej strony internetowej!
Visit footroll.plWe analyzed Footroll.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
footroll.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value27.3 s
0/100
25%
Value17.5 s
0/100
10%
Value28,180 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.02
100/100
15%
Value37.7 s
0/100
10%
558 ms
130 ms
255 ms
367 ms
368 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Footroll.pl, 19% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Img.footroll.pl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Img.footroll.pl.
Page size can be reduced by 90.2 kB (5%)
1.9 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Footroll.pl main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Footroll images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 27.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.5 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footroll.pl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (53%)
59
28
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Footroll. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
footroll.pl
558 ms
cms.css
130 ms
style.css
255 ms
post_comment.css
367 ms
form.css
368 ms
rwd.css
376 ms
font-awesome.min.css
376 ms
css
58 ms
css
72 ms
jquery-1.11.3.min.js
505 ms
gpt.js
55 ms
adsbygoogle.js
73 ms
jquery.loadPosts.js
379 ms
voting.js
484 ms
cms.min.js
485 ms
jquery.lazy.min.js
494 ms
triGallery.min.js
495 ms
cookiebox.min.js
495 ms
triScroller.min.js
686 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
686 ms
jquery.rwdSidebar.js
625 ms
jquery.holdOn.js
685 ms
jquery.mobile-events.min.js
685 ms
jquery.rwdtable.js
685 ms
analytics.js
171 ms
main.js
484 ms
aaaaaastrzze.jpg
1089 ms
bg-site-top.jpg
772 ms
logo.png
385 ms
search.svg
293 ms
77_728x90.jpg
470 ms
logo.png
389 ms
trew.png
1371 ms
pubads_impl_2022092801.js
275 ms
ppub_config
322 ms
show_ads_impl.js
114 ms
zrt_lookup.html
110 ms
user.svg
202 ms
comments.svg
342 ms
loader.gif
342 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5alOqER2jkVBuxM.ttf
281 ms
5aUz9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt7VRtuGdUhm8.ttf
203 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5fFPqER2jkVBuxM.ttf
372 ms
5aUt9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5TldsW1WpG1Lsw.ttf
381 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5eFIqER2jkVBuxM.ttf
273 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5f1LqER2jkVBuxM.ttf
279 ms
5aUu9_-1phKLFgshYDvh6Vwt5dlKqER2jkVBuxM.ttf
364 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
534 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
213 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
403 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
214 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVcUwaEQXjM.ttf
222 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWV4exYMUdjFnmg.ttf
284 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exYMUdjFnmg.ttf
411 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWV4exYMUdjFnmg.ttf
358 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exYMUdjFnmg.ttf
365 ms
bg-transfers.jpg
472 ms
collect
112 ms
bg-footlol.jpg
623 ms
positive.svg
381 ms
negative.svg
409 ms
trew.png
786 ms
aaaaaakowwnnaaaaas.jpg
672 ms
aaaaaaaxhkk.jpg
821 ms
aaaaaaaathooo.jpg
805 ms
bg-foosy.jpg
547 ms
play.svg
447 ms
bg-footer.jpg
486 ms
cookie.js
105 ms
integrator.js
107 ms
ads
69 ms
triGallery.css
464 ms
rwd-sidebar.css
550 ms
collect
82 ms
sdk.js
17 ms
sdk.js
7 ms
49 ms
footroll.pl accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
footroll.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
footroll.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footroll.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Footroll.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
footroll.pl
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Footroll. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: