Tools & Wizards About Us
footstep.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

footstep.in

Footstep | stainless steel railing, ss gate, ss railings

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

324 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

footstep.in screenshot

About Website

Welcome to footstep.in homepage info - get ready to check Footstep best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about footstep.in

Footstep - Manufacturer,Fabricator,Supplier of stainless steel railings, balcony railing, ss gates, stainless steel gates, staircase railing, metal grills, steel metal grills supplier, SS railing, gat...

Visit footstep.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Footstep.in page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

footstep.in performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

footstep.in

324 ms

footstep.in

427 ms

www.footstep.in

462 ms

www.footstep.in

1004 ms

analytics.js

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Footstep.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Footstep.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.4 kB (45%)

Content Size

112.4 kB

After Optimization

62.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Footstep.in main page is 112.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 82.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 22.9 kB
  • After minification 21.3 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 6.0 kB
  • After minification 6.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Footstep images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 32.9 kB

  • Original 82.3 kB
  • After minification 82.3 kB
  • After compression 49.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.9 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 315 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 930 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Footstep.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 315 B or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (45%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Footstep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

footstep.in

footstep.in

324 ms

footstep.in

footstep.in

427 ms

www.footstep.in

www.footstep.in

462 ms

www.footstep.in

www.footstep.in

1004 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

20 ms

global.css

global.css

131 ms

nav.css

nav.css

227 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

410 ms

jquery.numeric.js

jquery.numeric.js

309 ms

sendquery.js

sendquery.js

326 ms

comman.js

comman.js

317 ms

style.css

style.css

331 ms

fractionslider.css

fractionslider.css

329 ms

news.css

news.css

451 ms

jquery.fractionslider.js

jquery.fractionslider.js

452 ms

main.js

main.js

451 ms

modernizr.custom.28468.js

modernizr.custom.28468.js

438 ms

common.js

common.js

451 ms

mootools.js

mootools.js

532 ms

LazyLoad.js

LazyLoad.js

544 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

104 ms

jquery.cslider.js

jquery.cslider.js

604 ms

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js

jquery.unobtrusive-ajax.js

603 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

603 ms

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

jquery.validate.unobtrusive.js

604 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

js

js

67 ms

css

css

22 ms

fbds.js

fbds.js

85 ms

79 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

78 ms

nav_bg.png

nav_bg.png

159 ms

logo.png

logo.png

154 ms

wtransparent.png

wtransparent.png

150 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

165 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

166 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

166 ms

open_arrow.gif

open_arrow.gif

256 ms

send_query.png

send_query.png

260 ms

close_arrow.gif

close_arrow.gif

264 ms

send_query_minus.png

send_query_minus.png

269 ms

QueryCaptchaImage.jpg

QueryCaptchaImage.jpg

283 ms

Refresh.png

Refresh.png

288 ms

request.jpg

request.jpg

455 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

363 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

855 ms

light_bg.png

light_bg.png

381 ms

dark_bg.png

dark_bg.png

394 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

793 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

783 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

1012 ms

5.jpg

5.jpg

998 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

954 ms

video_img.jpg

video_img.jpg

888 ms

h_text-parten.png

h_text-parten.png

910 ms

h_news_bg.jpg

h_news_bg.jpg

959 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

992 ms

gwtp.png

gwtp.png

1013 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf

30 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf

30 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf

31 ms

calibri.html

calibri.html

1015 ms

74 ms

31 ms

27 ms

29 ms

fs.prevnext.png

fs.prevnext.png

124 ms

fs.pager.png

fs.pager.png

121 ms

calibri.ttf

calibri.ttf

335 ms

SEO Factors

footstep.in SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Footstep.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Footstep.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

footstep.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Footstep. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: