Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

forexcomreview.co

FOREX.com Review 2023 | Must Read Pros, Trading Products & Fees

Page Load Speed

6.3 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

378 ms

forexcomreview.co screenshot

About Website

Visit forexcomreview.co now to see the best up-to-date FOREX Com Review content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about forexcomreview.co

Check FOREX.com review 2023 to know our expert's views regarding their trading platform, pros, account opening & more from our FOREX.com review.

Visit forexcomreview.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Forexcomreview.co page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

forexcomreview.co performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.7 s

24/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.6 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

forexcomreview.co

147 ms

www.forexcomreview.co

418 ms

style.min.css

152 ms

css

32 ms

styles.css

219 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Forexcomreview.co, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (718 ms) belongs to the original domain Forexcomreview.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 47.3 kB (29%)

Content Size

163.7 kB

After Optimization

116.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Forexcomreview.co main page is 163.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 103.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 47.3 kB

  • Original 60.6 kB
  • After minification 57.0 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 103.1 kB
  • After minification 103.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FOREX Com Review images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (50%)

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FOREX Com Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

forexcomreview.co accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

forexcomreview.co best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

forexcomreview.co SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forexcomreview.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forexcomreview.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FOREX Com Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: