Tools & Wizards About Us
fotogram.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 77

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

fotogram.com

fotogram.com

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

110 ms

fotogram.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fotogram content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fotogram.com

Visit fotogram.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fotogram.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fotogram.com performance score

77

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

17/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

93/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.018

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

86/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fotogram.com

1228 ms

bootstrap.css

97 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

146 ms

jquery.js

341 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

147 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Fotogram.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Api.flickr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fotogram.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 351.2 kB (83%)

Content Size

425.7 kB

After Optimization

74.5 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fotogram.com main page is 425.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 326.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 855 B, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 267.0 kB

  • Original 326.3 kB
  • After minification 194.1 kB
  • After compression 59.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 267.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 81.2 kB

  • Original 95.3 kB
  • After minification 79.1 kB
  • After compression 14.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fotogram.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 81.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (84%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

3

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fotogram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fotogram.com

fotogram.com

1228 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

97 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

146 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

341 ms

bootstrap-transition.js

bootstrap-transition.js

147 ms

bootstrap-alert.js

bootstrap-alert.js

206 ms

bootstrap-modal.js

bootstrap-modal.js

208 ms

bootstrap-dropdown.js

bootstrap-dropdown.js

166 ms

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

bootstrap-scrollspy.js

211 ms

bootstrap-tab.js

bootstrap-tab.js

212 ms

bootstrap-tooltip.js

bootstrap-tooltip.js

235 ms

bootstrap-popover.js

bootstrap-popover.js

273 ms

bootstrap-button.js

bootstrap-button.js

275 ms

bootstrap-collapse.js

bootstrap-collapse.js

280 ms

bootstrap-carousel.js

bootstrap-carousel.js

280 ms

bootstrap-typeahead.js

bootstrap-typeahead.js

303 ms

underscore-min.js

underscore-min.js

359 ms

backbone-min.js

backbone-min.js

362 ms

fotogram-flickr.js

fotogram-flickr.js

364 ms

271 ms

Accessibility Review

fotogram.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fotogram.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fotogram.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fotogram.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Fotogram.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fotogram.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fotogram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: