2.7 sec in total
115 ms
2.3 sec
271 ms
Visit fototravel.net now to see the best up-to-date Fototravel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fototravel.net
banco de fotos e imágenes a la venta de viajes, turismo y naturaleza de autor
Visit fototravel.netWe analyzed Fototravel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 115 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
fototravel.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
44/100
10%
Value8.5 s
1/100
25%
Value8.4 s
18/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.068
96/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
115 ms
411 ms
53 ms
55 ms
122 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Fototravel.net, 8% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fototravel.net.
Page size can be reduced by 386.4 kB (40%)
973.0 kB
586.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Fototravel.net main page is 973.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 476.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fototravel images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 325.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 325.8 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fototravel.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (57%)
74
32
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fototravel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fototravel.net
115 ms
www.fototravel.net
411 ms
dfp.js
53 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
55 ms
boxy.css
122 ms
jquery.123.min.js
150 ms
jquery.boxy.js
130 ms
pixaria.css
133 ms
pixaria.lightbox.css
108 ms
prototype.js
144 ms
scriptaculous.js
147 ms
pixaria.filesearchhover.js
173 ms
pixaria.global.js
191 ms
pixaria.lightbox.js
252 ms
pixaria.multifile.js
198 ms
show_ads.js
7 ms
urchin.js
7 ms
gpt.js
7 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
13 ms
container.html
9 ms
builder.js
97 ms
effects.js
41 ms
dragdrop.js
59 ms
controls.js
110 ms
slider.js
70 ms
sound.js
102 ms
background_new.gif
84 ms
ft_lupa_busqueda.gif
85 ms
ft_logo_f000.jpg
85 ms
ft_telefono_email.gif
84 ms
log_blog_min.jpg
84 ms
pixaria.image.php
95 ms
pixaria.image.php
1330 ms
pixaria.image.php
243 ms
pixaria.image.php
226 ms
rss_ft2.gif
223 ms
pixaria.image.php
1264 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
1427 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
248 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
243 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
282 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
282 ms
pixaria.thumbnail.php
344 ms
ft_compartir_postales.gif
365 ms
logo_ccVisa.gif
320 ms
logo_ccMC.gif
364 ms
logo_ccAmex.gif
395 ms
logo_ccDiscover.gif
405 ms
logo_ccEcheck.gif
412 ms
PayPal_mark_37x23.gif
448 ms
anuncio2-99.php
441 ms
ads
150 ms
image_loading.gif
480 ms
zrt_lookup.html
34 ms
show_ads_impl.js
53 ms
__utm.gif
5 ms
ads
232 ms
osd.js
38 ms
ca-pub-5192236224377005.js
51 ms
ads
184 ms
osd.js
20 ms
abg.js
34 ms
000000_new_ico.gif
58 ms
m_js_controller.js
50 ms
favicon
58 ms
s
41 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
56 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
29 ms
x_button_blue2.png
31 ms
boxy-nw.png
46 ms
boxy-ne.png
51 ms
boxy-sw.png
58 ms
boxy-se.png
83 ms
Lrq7Jibxdtv2QOPyDSqncpDfQFNs3PE6SoUrUNh2GTU.js
5 ms
dark-floating.css
15 ms
loading.gif
54 ms
closelabel.gif
51 ms
ui
30 ms
fototravel.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fototravel.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
fototravel.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fototravel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fototravel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fototravel.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fototravel. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: