498 ms in total
142 ms
235 ms
121 ms
Visit frontlook.com now to see the best up-to-date Frontlook content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about frontlook.com
Visit frontlook.comWe analyzed Frontlook.com page load time and found that the first response time was 142 ms and then it took 356 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
frontlook.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
3/100
10%
Value8.3 s
2/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
142 ms
80 ms
69 ms
Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Frontlook.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (142 ms) belongs to the original domain Frontlook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 952 B (56%)
1.7 kB
758 B
In fact, the total size of Frontlook.com main page is 1.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 952 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 952 B or 56% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
1
1
The browser has sent 1 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Frontlook. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
frontlook.com
142 ms
Flook.gif
80 ms
bannerline.gif
69 ms
frontlook.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
frontlook.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
frontlook.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Frontlook.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Frontlook.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
frontlook.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Frontlook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: