9.7 sec in total
956 ms
8.6 sec
145 ms
Welcome to futurebook.in homepage info - get ready to check Futurebook best content right away, or after learning these important things about futurebook.in
Visit futurebook.inWe analyzed Futurebook.in page load time and found that the first response time was 956 ms and then it took 8.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
futurebook.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value6.5 s
9/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value280 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.484
17/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
956 ms
1412 ms
355 ms
731 ms
694 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Futurebook.in, 78% (47 requests) were made to Article.show and 10% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) relates to the external source Article.show.
Page size can be reduced by 82.0 kB (19%)
435.5 kB
353.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurebook.in main page is 435.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 314.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.0 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Futurebook needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 54.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 54.7 kB or 17% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurebook.in has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (74%)
50
13
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurebook. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futurebook.in
956 ms
www.article.show
1412 ms
owl.carousel.css
355 ms
fontawesome-all.css
731 ms
flaticon.css
694 ms
meanmenu.css
699 ms
bootstrap.min.css
836 ms
video.min.css
928 ms
lightbox.css
930 ms
progess.css
1090 ms
style.css
1156 ms
responsive.css
1105 ms
switch.css
1318 ms
js
64 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
1165 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1163 ms
popper.min.js
1497 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1445 ms
jarallax.js
1538 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1464 ms
lightbox.js
1463 ms
jquery.meanmenu.js
1781 ms
scrollreveal.min.js
1665 ms
jquery.counterup.min.js
1680 ms
waypoints.min.js
1684 ms
jquery-ui.js
2635 ms
gmap3.min.js
1915 ms
switch.js
1959 ms
js
50 ms
script.js
1917 ms
css
27 ms
js
116 ms
close.png
552 ms
loading.gif
861 ms
prev.png
911 ms
next.png
777 ms
preloader.gif
809 ms
f-logo.png
862 ms
logo.png
1008 ms
lb-1.jpg
1072 ms
lb-2.jpg
1355 ms
fb-1.jpg
1155 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
45 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
71 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
82 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
83 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
83 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
97 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1643 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
1399 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
collect
29 ms
color-2.css
371 ms
color-3.css
378 ms
color-4.css
407 ms
color-5.css
402 ms
color-6.css
392 ms
color-7.css
375 ms
color-8.css
361 ms
color-9.css
385 ms
futurebook.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
futurebook.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
futurebook.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurebook.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurebook.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurebook.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurebook. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: