Tools & Wizards About Us
futurecarsreview.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

futurecarsreview.com

futurecarsreview.com

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

648 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

futurecarsreview.com screenshot

About Website

Visit futurecarsreview.com now to see the best up-to-date Futurecarsreview content for Indonesia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futurecarsreview.com

News,Spec,Price

Visit futurecarsreview.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Futurecarsreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futurecarsreview.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.futurecarsreview.com

648 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

75 ms

sociable.css

112 ms

style.css

145 ms

css

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Futurecarsreview.com, 11% (6 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (648 ms) belongs to the original domain Futurecarsreview.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 192.8 kB (35%)

Content Size

549.2 kB

After Optimization

356.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Futurecarsreview.com main page is 549.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 231.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 51.8 kB
  • After minification 47.2 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 231.2 kB
  • After minification 223.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurecarsreview images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 106.5 kB

  • Original 222.9 kB
  • After minification 221.2 kB
  • After compression 116.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.5 kB or 48% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 43.4 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurecarsreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (51%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurecarsreview. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.futurecarsreview.com

www.futurecarsreview.com

648 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

75 ms

sociable.css

sociable.css

112 ms

style.css

style.css

145 ms

css

css

25 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

198 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

133 ms

sociable.js

sociable.js

150 ms

vuible.js

vuible.js

141 ms

addtofavorites.js

addtofavorites.js

166 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

48 ms

brand

brand

15 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

4 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

211 ms

simplecatch_slider.js

simplecatch_slider.js

212 ms

simplecatch_search.js

simplecatch_search.js

210 ms

brand

brand

66 ms

978.css

978.css

78 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

167 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

136 ms

header-bg.jpg

header-bg.jpg

122 ms

header-top-footer-bg.jpg

header-top-footer-bg.jpg

122 ms

LOGO1-300x114.png

LOGO1-300x114.png

120 ms

2017-Kia-Optima-210x210.jpg

2017-Kia-Optima-210x210.jpg

157 ms

2016-Kia-Cadenza-210x210.jpg

2016-Kia-Cadenza-210x210.jpg

156 ms

2017-Nissan-X-Trail-FCV-210x210.jpg

2017-Nissan-X-Trail-FCV-210x210.jpg

156 ms

2017-Jaguar-F-Type-SVR-Coupe-210x210.jpeg

2017-Jaguar-F-Type-SVR-Coupe-210x210.jpeg

176 ms

2016-Renault-Kadjar-210x210.jpg

2016-Renault-Kadjar-210x210.jpg

175 ms

2016-Nissan-Maxima-SR-Midnight-rear-210x210.jpg

2016-Nissan-Maxima-SR-Midnight-rear-210x210.jpg

175 ms

2016-Hyundai-Creta-210x210.jpg

2016-Hyundai-Creta-210x210.jpg

217 ms

2017-Ford-Escape-210x210.jpg

2017-Ford-Escape-210x210.jpg

207 ms

2016-Bentley-Bentayga-210x210.jpg

2016-Bentley-Bentayga-210x210.jpg

209 ms

2016-Mitsubishi-Outlander-210x210.jpg

2016-Mitsubishi-Outlander-210x210.jpg

232 ms

LOGO-150x125.png

LOGO-150x125.png

224 ms

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

google_custom_search_watermark.gif

187 ms

ca-pub-6981719231712522.js

ca-pub-6981719231712522.js

162 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

161 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

65 ms

post-by-seperator.jpg

post-by-seperator.jpg

196 ms

ul-bg-prev.png

ul-bg-prev.png

264 ms

ul-bg.png

ul-bg.png

254 ms

regstat.aspx

regstat.aspx

558 ms

ads

ads

313 ms

osd.js

osd.js

65 ms

ads

ads

303 ms

ads

ads

271 ms

ads

ads

400 ms

abg.js

abg.js

26 ms

m_js_controller.js

m_js_controller.js

4 ms

favicon

favicon

79 ms

s

s

11 ms

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png

28 ms

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png

9 ms

x_button_blue2.png

x_button_blue2.png

10 ms

belcounter_line.gif

belcounter_line.gif

97 ms

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js

3 ms

SEO Factors

futurecarsreview.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurecarsreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Futurecarsreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

futurecarsreview.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Futurecarsreview. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: