Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

futureclaw.com

FutureClaw

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

123 ms

Resources Loaded

881 ms

Page Rendered

235 ms

futureclaw.com screenshot

About Website

Visit futureclaw.com now to see the best up-to-date Future Claw content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futureclaw.com

Beautiful Fashion

Visit futureclaw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Futureclaw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futureclaw.com performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futureclaw.com

123 ms

www.futureclaw.com

207 ms

24816501960_64a6481ce3_b.jpg

478 ms

24973162250_5647897cb0_m.jpg

231 ms

24975084712_d3a00110ae_m.jpg

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Futureclaw.com, 56% (27 requests) were made to Farm2.staticflickr.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Farm1.staticflickr.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) relates to the external source Farm2.staticflickr.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 56.8 kB (6%)

Content Size

925.3 kB

After Optimization

868.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Futureclaw.com main page is 925.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 830.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 56.8 kB

  • Original 73.7 kB
  • After minification 73.2 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 830.6 kB
  • After minification 830.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Future Claw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 21.0 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 20.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Claw. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

futureclaw.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

futureclaw.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

futureclaw.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureclaw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futureclaw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Future Claw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: