9.3 sec in total
4.1 sec
5 sec
229 ms
Visit futureip.com now to see the best up-to-date FutureIP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futureip.com
FutureIP Labs is group of customer-centric companies that provide cutting edge technology to new-age business challenges Our Ecosystem Contact Us Why Future IP Started by successful serial entrepreneu...
Visit futureip.comWe analyzed Futureip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.1 sec and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
futureip.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value2,080 ms
7/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value13.1 s
12/100
10%
4087 ms
89 ms
122 ms
82 ms
78 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Futureip.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Futureip.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (72%)
2.0 MB
546.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Futureip.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FutureIP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 471.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 471.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 919.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futureip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 919.6 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (77%)
57
13
The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FutureIP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futureip.com
4087 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
89 ms
dashicons.min.css
122 ms
jquery-ui-dialog.min.css
82 ms
styles.css
78 ms
settings.css
117 ms
main.min.css
91 ms
css
66 ms
reset.css
115 ms
foundation.css
168 ms
ionicons.min.css
35 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
135 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
146 ms
style.css
205 ms
schon-responsive.css
141 ms
js_composer.min.css
337 ms
jquery.js
183 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
159 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
213 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
195 ms
custom.modernizr.js
189 ms
css
38 ms
css
48 ms
css
25 ms
core.min.js
178 ms
widget.min.js
184 ms
mouse.min.js
186 ms
resizable.min.js
197 ms
draggable.min.js
197 ms
button.min.js
201 ms
position.min.js
203 ms
dialog.min.js
205 ms
wpdialog.min.js
215 ms
comment-reply.min.js
216 ms
jquery.form.min.js
219 ms
scripts.js
220 ms
foundation.min.js
224 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.js
239 ms
superfish.min.js
234 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
240 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
241 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
240 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
210 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
206 ms
flickity.pkgd.min.js
203 ms
schon.js
203 ms
js_composer_front.js
181 ms
fip_logo.png
74 ms
slider_1.jpg
66 ms
slider_31.jpg
117 ms
home_flamenco.jpg
56 ms
home_jamocha.jpg
54 ms
home_eco.jpg
54 ms
foot_logo.png
56 ms
IczWvq5y_Cwwv_rBjOtT0w.woff
211 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
212 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIxsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
243 ms
ionicons.ttf
191 ms
MYWJ4lYm5dbZ1UBuYox79D8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
252 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
153 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
155 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
146 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
148 ms
y7lebkjgREBJK96VQi37ZobN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
51 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
50 ms
futureip.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
futureip.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
futureip.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futureip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futureip.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FutureIP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: