9.2 sec in total
1.8 sec
7.1 sec
291 ms
Welcome to futurelifeplan.com homepage info - get ready to check Future Life Plan best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about futurelifeplan.com
Last updated by the coach at March 20, 2015.
Visit futurelifeplan.comWe analyzed Futurelifeplan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
futurelifeplan.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value15.7 s
0/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value40.5 s
0/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.293
41/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
1828 ms
472 ms
467 ms
471 ms
475 ms
Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Futurelifeplan.com, 15% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 15% (10 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Futurelifeplan.com.
Page size can be reduced by 269.5 kB (33%)
806.6 kB
537.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurelifeplan.com main page is 806.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 426.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Future Life Plan images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 110.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.0 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurelifeplan.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (57%)
61
26
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Life Plan. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.futurelifeplan.com
1828 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
472 ms
plugin_styles.css
467 ms
color-picker.min.css
471 ms
styles.css
475 ms
public.css
477 ms
fontfaces.css
478 ms
style.css
939 ms
style-frontpage.css
717 ms
jetpack.css
725 ms
jquery.js
1177 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
730 ms
frontend.js
730 ms
nivo-slider.js
949 ms
style-mobile.css
964 ms
jquery.form.min.js
964 ms
scripts.js
964 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
4 ms
gprofiles.js
55 ms
wpgroho.js
1169 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
ga.js
20 ms
header.jpg
946 ms
Facebook.png
240 ms
GooglePlus.png
238 ms
Phone.png
240 ms
banner.jpg
1176 ms
tile1.jpg
705 ms
tile2.jpg
715 ms
tile3.jpg
702 ms
tile4.jpg
708 ms
tile5.jpg
1187 ms
tile6.jpg
1189 ms
likebox.php
484 ms
loading.gif
238 ms
ubuntu-regular-webfont.woff
480 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
481 ms
elusive.woff
464 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
434 ms
www.futurelifeplan.com
807 ms
hovercard.css
27 ms
services.css
53 ms
ajax-loader.gif
413 ms
g.gif
4 ms
arrows.png
586 ms
ebiMDO3r-8l.css
47 ms
jGc-59L_9lo.css
49 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
54 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
70 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
52 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
82 ms
11043027_795420277199516_3232775895945852679_n.png
272 ms
11406935_840064062735137_6684878861381743166_n.jpg
64 ms
12743653_1019679194771570_7692273258607893904_n.jpg
11 ms
10603276_1524724984498312_2130827636629366645_n.jpg
27 ms
1425544_194752780899848_3640203286362897117_n.jpg
10 ms
10868011_690783604374279_2774857808390314995_n.jpg
16 ms
10985589_394504917397722_5879461313864254458_n.jpg
23 ms
12341052_10156379016385253_4564472838780700098_n.jpg
138 ms
12239957_10153134758842327_7779233749527377344_n.jpg
61 ms
29811_597170627098516_2407009942765649399_n.jpg
29 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
5 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
5 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
9 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
3 ms
futurelifeplan.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
futurelifeplan.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
futurelifeplan.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurelifeplan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurelifeplan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurelifeplan.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Future Life Plan. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: